Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-20

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The table provides the statistics of minor, serious and death causing injuries in the country of United Kingdom between the period of 1998 and 2007 and demonstrates the percentaage of each cause, increase over the years.

It is clearly seen that total figures of injuries are inclining over the years which is mainly contributed by minor injuries, and the proportion of rising cases also increase with slight injuries at maximum and fatality rate at the minimum.

In case of death causing injuries, caused by gun and knife, the number starts at 49 fatalities in the period between 1998 and 1999, which gradually increases over the years and gives its highest figure at 95 fatalities between the year 2001 and 1992, after this the fatality rate shows a steady drop until it reaches where it starts, 49 fatalities between 2005 and 2006. For serious injuries, the stats shows that the figure starts off at 162 and ends at 476 between the year 2005 and 2006, and there is no data for the period of 2006 to 2007.

At last, gun and knife causing slight injuries are at 653 in the year 1998 to 1999 and the numbers keeps o exacerbating till 3206 injuries by the year 2005 to 2006 and there is again no data for the remaining period, Total number of cases also increases gradually over the period. Last but not least, the percentage increase for these categories also expresses that fatal rate is at 18 percentage whereas serious and slight inuries are at 194 and 405 respectively.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify the broad pattern that totals rise and that slight injuries are the largest category, and you include several relevant figures. However, some reporting is incomplete or inaccurate: the total peaks at 3,912 in 2004–05 before falling to 3,821, rather than simply increasing throughout. The slight-injury figure for 2005–06 is 3,296, not 3,206, and the fatality count does not steadily decline after its peak: it falls, rises to 77, then falls again. You also omit the total percentage increase of 342% and do not clearly explain that the percentage increases refer to the period shown. A more precise overview and carefully checked comparisons would make the summary more complete and reliable.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable sequence: an introduction, an overview, and discussion of fatal, serious and slight injuries. This gives the reader a basic route through the information. However, progression is weakened by repetitive transitions such as “At last” and “Last but not least,” and the final paragraph combines slight injuries, totals and percentage increases without a clear separation of points. Some references are also difficult to follow, as in “reaches where it starts,” while “the remaining period” is vague. Organise the details into clearer groups, use topic sentences to signal comparisons, and connect each figure directly to the trend it supports. This would make the overall arrangement easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some relevant vocabulary for describing data, including “fatalities,” “serious injuries,” “proportion” and “percentage increase.” However, several choices are inaccurate or unnatural for a statistical summary. “Minor injuries” is not the table’s category name; “slight injuries” is more precise. “Death causing injuries” and “gun and knife causing slight injuries” are awkward, while “exacerbating” suggests worsening rather than a numerical rise. There are also noticeable spelling errors, including “percentaage” and “inuries.” Aim for consistent category labels and straightforward reporting verbs such as “rose,” “fell” and “accounted for.” More accurate collocations would improve clarity and control.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt a mixture of longer sentences and shorter statements, but complex sentences are often difficult to control, and errors recur in agreement, tense and sentence construction. For example, “the numbers keeps” has a subject–verb agreement error, while “the stats shows” does not agree either. The sentence beginning “In case of death causing injuries” becomes awkwardly structured, and “between the year 2001 and 1992” makes the time reference unclear. Punctuation is also needed to separate some joined ideas, particularly in the final paragraph. Use shorter, complete sentences when presenting several figures, check singular and plural subjects, and keep past-tense reporting consistent. These changes would make the data easier to understand.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.