Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-21

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The table illustrates the statistics of fatal,serious and slight injuries becuase of gun and knife.The table had provide the data from 1998 till 2007.

From year 1998 till 2001, the crime rate of fatal increased gradually from 49 to 72 therefore, till 2002 it reached 95.Afterwards,it started decreasing and in 2006 its takes place to 49 same as it was at start but in 2007 it increased and reached 56.

serious injuries were 162 at the start of the year and increased massively and reached 392 by the year 2002.Afterwards,it donot stopped and kept increasing till 2004(437).In 2004 to 2005 it slightly decrased but ended up with 476 serious injuries in 2005 to 2006.

Lastly slight injuries had the highest statistics all above other two.In year 1998 to 1999 its was 653 slight injuries and skyrocketed and reached 1683 injuries by the year 2002 to 2003.Moreover, it donot stopped and kept increasing and ended at 3296 in year 2006.

In Conclusion,the crime through fatal injuries injuries increased by 18%,crime through serious injuries increaed by 194% and laslty the highest ratio of crimes was slight injuries which increased by 405%.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify the three injury categories and report several relevant trends, including the rise in slight injuries and the overall percentage increases. However, the summary is only partly complete: there is no clear overview of the table’s main pattern, and the total figures are not discussed. Some details are inaccurate or unclear. For example, fatal injuries in 2006–07 were 58, not 56, and the serious-injury figure of 437 belongs to 2003–04, rather than 2004. The table also shows slight injuries peaking at 3,424 in 2004–05 before falling to 3,296, a key change your account misses. A concise overview and more precise selection of comparisons would make the report more fully informative.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the injury categories, and a concluding statement. This makes the information reasonably easy to follow, and sequencing expressions such as “Afterwards” and “Lastly” help signal movement between points. However, the progression is sometimes mechanical, with repeated “kept increasing” and “reached” constructions, and the conclusion repeats percentage figures rather than drawing together the main trends. Some links between time periods are also unclear, as in “In 2004 to 2005,” which makes the sequence harder to track. To strengthen the organisation, group related trends more deliberately and use clearer references to the year ranges and turning points.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the basic subject, including “fatal,” “serious injuries,” “increased,” and “decreased.” There are also attempts at more vivid wording, such as “skyrocketed,” but this is too informal for an academic data report and does not always suit the measured changes shown. Several noticeable spelling and word-choice errors reduce precision, including “becuase,” “decrased,” “increaed,” and “laslty.” Phrases such as “the highest statistics all above other two” are also unnatural and make the comparison less clear. Aim for accurate, neutral reporting language and check spelling carefully; a smaller set of well-controlled terms is more effective than informal or imprecise expressions.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences linked with time expressions, but the range is limited and errors occur frequently enough to affect clarity. Examples include “The table had provide,” where the verb form is incorrect, and “it donot stopped,” which has faulty auxiliary and verb forms. There are also problems with articles, agreement, and sentence boundaries, as in “In year 1998 to 1999 its was 653 slight injuries.” Commas are often missing after introductory phrases, while some sentences join ideas without clear punctuation. Practise accurate past-tense reporting and build longer sentences from reliable patterns, such as “Fatal injuries rose from 49 to 72, then peaked at 95 in 2001–02.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.