Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-21

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The table illustrate the number of Fatal,Serious, and slight injuries resulting form gun and knife crimes in Great Britain between 1998 and 2007, along with the percentage increase for each level of severity.

Overall, it is clear that total injuries from gun and knife violance in Great Britain grew continuously over the given period.additionally slight injuries were consistently the most common type of harm reported,while fatal incident remained the lowest throughout the years.

In [redacted phone],slight injuries formed the vast majority of recorded cases at 653,while serious injuries and fatal incidmets stood significantly lower at 162 and 49 ,respectively.over the subsequent years,all three categories exhibited a steady upward trajectory.By [redacted phone],slight injuries had Breached the thousand mark to reach 1066,whereas serious injuries rose to 244 and fatal cases rechead 72.Throughout the entire timeframe,slight injuries continuosly remained the predominant degree of harm.

Looking at the figure , overall casualties resulating from gun and knife crime in great breatin increased markedly from 864 in [redacted phone] to 1382 in [redacted phone] alon.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You identify the subject and provide a relevant overview: slight injuries were the most common, while fatal cases were the least common. You also include several accurate early figures, such as 653 slight injuries and 162 serious injuries in 1998–99, and the rise in total cases to 1,382 by 2000–01. However, the report only partially covers the table: it stops in the middle of a sentence and does not describe the later years or the percentage increases, which are important features. The claim that all three categories rose steadily is also too broad, since fatal injuries fluctuated and fell to 49 in 2005–06. Develop the overview and compare the full period, including the sharp rise in slight injuries and the overall increase.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a recognisable structure, moving from an introduction and overview to details about the early years. Phrases such as “Overall” and “By 2000–2001” help signal the direction of the report. However, progression is limited: the final paragraph repeats the total-increase point and ends abruptly at “2000-2001 alon,” leaving the discussion incomplete. There is also repetition of the idea that slight injuries were predominant, stated in both the overview and the body without adding much new information. Organise the details into a clearer sequence—for example, compare the starting and ending figures, then describe notable changes—and use linking phrases to show contrasts as well as time progression.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some suitable task vocabulary, including “percentage increase,” “severity,” “vast majority,” and “predominant,” and the reader can generally understand the intended comparisons. However, spelling and word-choice errors are noticeable, including “violance,” “incidmets,” “rechead,” and “resulating.” Some expressions are also imprecise or awkward, such as “fatal incident” when referring to injury counts and “Breached the thousand mark.” These errors reduce the accuracy and polish of the report, even though the main meaning is usually recoverable. Check spelling carefully and choose standard statistical collocations, such as “rose to,” “accounted for,” and “the number of fatal injuries.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and more complex sentences, including a contrast with “while” and a time clause beginning “By 2000–2001.” Some sentence structures communicate the data clearly. However, errors occur frequently enough to affect fluency and accuracy. For example, “The table illustrate” has subject–verb disagreement, and “total injuries … grew … additionally slight injuries” runs together without appropriate sentence punctuation or capitalization. Commas are often missing after introductory phrases, and spacing around punctuation is inconsistent. The final sentence is incomplete, which leaves its grammatical relationship unclear. Practise checking agreement, sentence boundaries, and punctuation, then proofread each sentence to ensure it is complete and correctly joined.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.