Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-21

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 4.5)

The given table chart elucidates information about great britain gun and knife crime statistics 1998 - 2007 . The chart compares different categories and presents the data in number or percentages .

Overall, it is clear that there are noticeable among the categories shown in the chart . 2004 to 2005 the hightest degree of injury . Furthermore some categories show some fluctuations increment as well as decrement whereas for some cases they remain stable .

According to the chart , the first main activity 1998 - 1999 of injury the fatal 49 degree , Serious 162 degree , Slight 653 degree , Total degree of injury 864 . The followed by second activity [redacted phone] fatal 62 , Serious 200 , Slight 653 , Total degree of injury 1195 , come then [redacted phone] fatal 72 , Serious 244 , Slight 1066 , Total of injury 1382 , [redacted phone] fatal 95 , Serious 392 , Slight 1390 , the total of injury 1877 degree , [redacted phone] fatal 80 , Serious 416 , Slight 1683 , Total of injury 2179 degree . This show a clear comparison all the actvities .

Let's have a look at remaning information , 2006to2007 Fatal 58 degree , Serious 0 degree , Slight 0 degree , Total 0 degree , the percentages increase 98/99-2005/06 or 06/07 Fatal 18 degree , Serious 194 degree , Slight 405 and the total of injury 342 percent . Furthermore , all the provided data suggest that there in no stability in all the activities .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

The response identifies the table’s subject and attempts an overview, but it reports the main features only minimally and includes important inaccuracies. For example, it gives the 1999–2000 slight-injury figure as 653, whereas the table shows 933, and it treats the dashes for serious, slight and total injuries in 2006–2007 as zero; those values are not provided. The overview that 2004–2005 had the highest injury level is broadly relevant, but it misses the overall rise in totals to 2004–2005 followed by a small decline, and the large increases in slight and serious injuries. Select key trends and compare them accurately rather than listing many figures without explaining their significance.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.0

There is an attempt to organise the response into an introduction, overview and two detail paragraphs, and phrases such as “Overall” and “Let's have a look” signal movement between sections. However, the information is not arranged coherently enough: the first detail paragraph becomes a long sequence of figures, while the final paragraph jumps to 2006–2007 and then the percentage row without a clear comparison or progression. Repeated wording such as “degree of injury” and “activity” also makes the relationships between figures difficult to follow. Group the data by meaningful trends—for example, totals and slight injuries, then fatal and serious injuries—and use clear links to show how each comparison supports the overview.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The response uses some task-related vocabulary, including “fatal,” “serious,” “slight,” “fluctuations” and “percentages,” so the topic is generally recognisable. However, the range is basic and repetitive, and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate or unclear, such as “first main activity,” “hightest degree of injury” and “remain stable.” Spelling and capitalisation are also inconsistent, as in “great britain,” “actvities” and “remaning.” These issues sometimes make the intended meaning harder to interpret. Use precise terms for the table’s categories and trends, such as “number of injuries,” “rose,” “fell” and “accounted for,” and check spelling and word forms before submitting.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response attempts a few longer structures, including “Furthermore some categories show…” and “all the provided data suggest…,” but most sentences are fragments or lists rather than controlled sentences. For instance, “2004 to 2005 the hightest degree of injury” has no complete verb structure, and “The followed by second activity…” is grammatically incomplete. Articles, agreement and sentence boundaries are also unreliable, as in “there in no stability” and the extended sequence of figures joined mainly by commas. These frequent errors can obscure the relationships between the data. Practise writing complete subject–verb sentences, then combine them with accurate clauses such as “while” or “whereas” to make comparisons.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.