Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-21

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 4.5)

The table illustrates the of fatal,serious and slight injuries because of guns and knife in britain in 1998 to 2007.overall, slightly injured were more in number and serious injured individual are second highest in number for about 194 percent.

furthermore, in 2004 to 2005 the number of slightly injured persons is significantly increases 3921 person is injured.Moreover in 2003 to 2004 the second highest injured person reported because of knifes and gunes 1862 in numbers.and in 2005 to [redacted phone] serious cases reported higest number of seriously injured individuals. 2001 to 2002 95 fatal cases reported significant numbers of deaths. in 2006 to 2007 only 58 deaths were reported and serious or slighly injured cases were not reported.

in contrast, the number of slightly injured persons are 405 in percentage approximately 194 percent and the sum of injured person is approximately 3921 cases reported in 2004 to 2005 the highest years of crimes.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response4.5
Coherence and Cohesion4.0
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy4.5
Overall4.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You identify the broad pattern that slight injuries were the most numerous and mention several relevant years, including the peak in 2004–05 and the fatal figure for 2006–07. However, the overview is incomplete and some key comparisons are inaccurate or unclear. The table gives 3,424 slight injuries in 2004–05, not 3,921, and the total for that year is 3,912. The 405% increase applies to slight injuries, while serious injuries rose by 194%; your final comparison mixes these figures. You also describe 2003–04 as having the second-highest number of injured people, although the total was higher in 2005–06. Focus on accurate overall trends and distinguish the injury categories and percentage changes clearly.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.0

There is an attempt to group information into an opening overview and a following paragraph of figures, and connectors such as “furthermore,” “moreover” and “in contrast” show an effort to link points. However, the sequence is difficult to follow because the response moves between years, injury categories and percentage changes without a clear organising principle. The final sentence repeats the 2004–05 peak and introduces figures that conflict with earlier statements. Some links, especially “in contrast,” do not express a clear contrast. Organise the report into a concise overview followed by comparisons of trends, and use linking phrases only when the relationship between the ideas is clear.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “fatal,” “serious,” “slightly injured,” “percentage” and “cases,” so the reader can recognise the subject of the table. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, which sometimes makes the meaning hard to interpret. For example, “serious injured individual” and “the highest years of crimes” are not natural ways to describe the data, while “because of knifes and gunes” is imprecise. Spelling errors such as “slighly” and “higest” also reduce clarity. Build a small set of accurate reporting phrases, such as “the number of people sustaining slight injuries” and “the figure rose to,” and check spelling and word forms.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response attempts to report several figures in connected sentences, but grammatical control is inconsistent and sentence structures are mostly simple or incomplete. Errors in agreement and verb forms appear in phrases such as “slightly injured were more in number” and “the number … is significantly increases.” Articles and sentence boundaries are also problematic, as in the opening “illustrates the of fatal…” and the run-on sequence beginning “Moreover in 2003 to 2004.” These errors sometimes make relationships between figures unclear. Practise forming complete sentences with a clear subject and verb, for example, “The number of slight injuries increased sharply to 3,424 in 2004–05.” Use consistent past tense and check punctuation between separate comparisons.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.