Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-24

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The table provides the data on different number of people who, fatal, serious and slight injurious due to gun and knife in Great Britian between 1998 to 2007.

Overall, it is evident that the number individuals who affect in [redacted phone] are highest, whereas number the persons who affect during [redacted phone] are lowest.Overll, the proportion of the slightly affected by crime is highest, while the fatal persons are lowest in percentage. The serious people are in average in proportion.

Moving to the details, in [redacted phone] the total number of people who affected by crimes had lowest. However. during [redacted phone] the affected persons were in moderate level, 2179 in number. Moreover, in [redacted phone] the number of individuals had highest in number with 3821. Meanwhile, 1382 people affectd by srimes in [redacted phone]. In [redacted phone] the numbers were 2367. The proportion of injuried person, fatal, serious, slight were increasing by 18%, 194% and 405%, while the total injuried persons had 345%.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You identify the broad pattern that slight injuries were the most common and fatal injuries the least common, and you include several accurate totals, such as 2,179 in 2002–2003 and 2,367 in 2003–2004. However, the overview is not consistently accurate: the highest total shown is 3,912 in 2004–2005, not 3,821 in 2005–2006, and the lowest is 864 in 1998–1999. The final increase for total injuries is 342%, not 345%. The response also gives little account of how the injury categories changed over time, and the claim that all categories increased overlooks the fatal figure’s fluctuations. Select the main trends more carefully and support them with accurate comparisons.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an opening, an overview and a paragraph of details, and linking expressions such as “Overall,” “Moreover” and “Meanwhile” help signal relationships. However, progression within the detail paragraph is uneven: figures from different years are listed without a clear chronological or category-based pattern, so the reader has to work to see the trends. The overview also repeats “Overall” and contains several ideas in a crowded sequence. Some transitions, including “However” before the 2002–2003 figure, do not clearly express a contrast. Group the data by trend or period, use links only where the relationship is clear, and separate the overview’s key comparisons into concise sentences.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “fatal,” “serious,” “slight,” “proportion” and “increased,” so the topic is generally identifiable. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations make the meaning awkward, as in “different number of people,” “slightly affected by crime” and “serious people.” Spelling errors such as “Britian,” “Overll,” “affectd” and “srimes” also reduce accuracy. Use the table’s terminology consistently—for example, “people sustaining slight injuries”—and choose precise expressions for totals and changes. More accurate collocations and careful spelling would make the information easier to understand without requiring more elaborate vocabulary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a contrast with “whereas” and a clause beginning “who,” but control is inconsistent. Errors occur in basic sentence patterns: “people who, fatal, serious and slight injurious” lacks a workable verb structure, while “the number individuals who affect” has missing grammatical elements and an incorrect verb form. Other examples include “the number of people who affected” and “the numbers were 2367,” where the intended relationship is not expressed clearly. Punctuation is also faulty in “However.” before the next sentence, and there is no space after “lowest.” Build accurate simple sentences first, then add subordinate clauses, checking subjects, verbs, articles and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.