Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-24

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The table illustrates the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain over nine-year period from 1998 to 2007.

Overall, it is clear that the slight injuries are majorly occured in the entire period, followed by serious crimes which gradually remained increasing. However, the fatal injuries remained relatively low.

Looking at the details, the serious injuries recorded with 162 in 1999 and remained high throughtout the entire period hovering over 200 in 2000 and ends at 476 in 2006. Moreover, the slight injuries registerd with 653 in 1999 and climbing exponentially to 1066 in 2001 and grew steadily to 3296 in 2006. The serious and slight did not have a record in 2007.

In contrast, the fatal injuries from gun and knife during 1998 is 48, then the numbers slightly gets increasing to 95 in 2002 and the numbers relatively dropping to 58 in 2007. Moreover the overall percentage is 18% which is subsequently lower than other two injuries

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify the main pattern that slight injuries were the most numerous and fatal injuries remained comparatively low, and you include several relevant figures. However, the overview is not fully accurate: serious injuries did not simply keep rising, since they fell from 437 in 2003–04 to 411 in 2004–05 before reaching 476. The description also omits the striking rise in slight injuries from 1,862 to 3,424 in 2004–05, and the claim that serious and slight injuries had no record in 2007 should be framed as missing data in the table. The fatal figure for 1998–99 is 49, not 48. More precise coverage of the key changes and the table’s percentage increases would make the summary more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for the injury categories. This helps the reader follow the broad comparison, and transitions such as “Looking at the details” and “In contrast” signal shifts in focus. However, the progression within the detail paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow because dates and figures are compressed into long sequences, and the comparison between categories is limited. Some linking is mechanical, particularly the repeated use of “Moreover,” while “the serious and slight did not have a record” has an unclear reference. Grouping the figures by trend and using clearer links between years would make the organisation more coherent and cohesion less noticeable.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use a reasonable range of task-related vocabulary, including “fatal,” “serious,” “slight,” “hovering,” and “climbing,” so the main information is generally understandable. There are also attempts at more descriptive language, such as “relatively low” and “grew steadily.” However, several word choices or collocations are inaccurate or awkward: “majorly occured” does not naturally describe the largest category, and “registerd with” is not the right expression for a figure. Spelling errors such as “throughtout” and “registerd” also reduce precision. Choose standard reporting verbs and collocations, and check spelling carefully; this would make the vocabulary more accurate and natural.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more developed sentence forms, including the overview beginning “Overall, it is clear that…” and the contrast introduced by “In contrast.” The meaning is usually recoverable, but grammatical errors occur across the response. For example, “over nine-year period” needs an article, and “the slight injuries are majorly occured” has an incorrect verb construction and tense. In “the numbers slightly gets increasing,” the subject and verb do not agree, and the verb phrase is not formed correctly. Tense also shifts between past and present when describing historical figures. Use consistent past-tense reporting, check subject–verb agreement, and build shorter, accurate clauses before adding more complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.