Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-26

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 5.0)

This table shows the crime rate in Great Britain for gun and knife crime. The situation is very bad. It has been increasing every year. The fatal injuries are increasing every year. From the table, we can see an 18% increase, which is a very alarming situation. If we look at serious injuries, there is a major increase from 1998 to 2006: 194%. But the good thing is that in 2007 there were zero serious and slight injuries both. It means Great Britain managed to solve this issue, and people are safe from this crime. Fatal injuries still exist at 58. They can not be able to eleminate it fully but we can hope best for their future. In previous years, slight and serious injuries percentage was extremely high. How they manage to completely vanish it is commendable. I think they impose strict policies to overcome gun and knife crime.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You identify the broad subject and include some relevant figures, such as the 18% rise in fatal injuries and the 194% increase in serious injuries. However, the account only partially reports the table’s main features and includes a major misreading: dashes for serious and slight injuries in 2006–07 mean figures are not provided, not that there were zero injuries or that the problem was solved. The claim that fatal injuries increased every year is also inaccurate; they fell in several years, including from 95 to 80 and from 77 to 49. The response gives no balanced overview of the overall rise and later changes in totals. Focus on describing the data rather than adding unsupported explanations or opinions.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

The response has a basic sequence, moving from fatal injuries to serious and slight injuries, and phrases such as “If we look at” signal a change of focus. However, the ideas do not develop in a clear overall progression: the discussion shifts from increases to an unsupported claim that injuries vanished, then to speculation about policies. There is no distinct overview or paragraphing to separate the main trends from supporting details. Some linking is repetitive, particularly the repeated use of “It” and “But,” and references such as “it” in “solve this issue” are not clearly tied to the table. Organise the response into an introduction, an overview, and grouped comparisons, using links that show contrast and change accurately.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use enough basic vocabulary to communicate the topic, including “fatal injuries,” “serious injuries,” “increase,” and “percentage.” There are also attempts at more evaluative language, such as “alarming” and “commendable,” but these are not appropriate for a neutral data summary and make the response sound opinion-based. Several expressions are imprecise or unnatural, including “crime rate” for counts of injuries and “vanish” for figures that are simply unavailable. Spelling errors such as “eleminate” are noticeable, and “hope best” is an awkward phrase. Build a more precise range for describing tables—especially terms for counts, proportions, rises, falls, and unavailable data—and avoid emotional judgements.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You produce several clear simple sentences, and some longer structures are understandable, such as “If we look at serious injuries, there is a major increase from 1998 to 2006.” This shows some ability to vary sentence forms, although most of the response relies on short, basic statements. There are errors in sentence construction and verb patterns: “They can not be able to eleminate it fully” combines incompatible forms, while “we can hope best for their future” is not grammatically complete in its current form. The sentence beginning “How they manage to completely vanish it” is also awkwardly formed as a statement. Practise accurate modal and infinitive patterns, and use past-tense forms consistently when reporting changes across the years.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.