Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-27

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The table demonstrate the different types of injuries fatal, serious and slight from gun and knife in great Britain .the total number of injuries display in form of number year between 1998 to 2007. Overall, it can clearly seen that year by year the total crime statistics slightly rise.

First, year of injuries 1998 to 1999 fatal show the only 49 but slight represent the large number 653. Furthermore, in year 1999 to 2001 the number injuries fatal, serious and slight slowly increase the total number is 1195 and 1382 respectively. In year 2001 to 2002 slight show the number of injuries 1390 but the fatal represent only 95 injuries. However, in year 2002 to 2004 the serious people almost stable and slight injury is showing high numbers 1683 and 1862. Than, year 2004 to 2005 slight name injuries accounted largest number 3424 but fatal represent only 77. The last year of injuries in Britain year 2006 to 2007 only one injury fatal 58 number of people. Moreover, the increase rate for fatal is 18 and for serious category 194 and slight increase rate is higher 405.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You identify the table’s subject and include an overview that totals generally rose, then support it with several figures, such as 49 fatal injuries and 653 slight injuries in 1998–99, and 3,424 slight injuries in 2004–05. However, the overview is too general: the rise was not steady, and the total peaked at 3,912 in 2004–05 before falling to 3,821 in 2005–06. Some details are inaccurate or incomplete: 2006–07 records 58 fatal injuries, but the table gives no figures for the other categories, rather than showing “only one injury” overall. You also omit the total percentage increase of 342%. Select the main trends more clearly and distinguish reported data from missing values.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a basic structure, moving from an introduction and overview to a sequence of year-based details. Linking expressions such as “Furthermore,” “However,” and “Moreover” show an attempt to connect information. However, the progression is difficult to follow because the figures are presented in a chronological list without a clear grouping of the main trends, and some transitions do not express a meaningful contrast. For example, “However” introduces figures for 2002–04 without explaining what they contrast with. Several sentences also combine multiple categories and years, making comparisons unclear. Organise the body around key patterns—such as the overall rise, the dominance of slight injuries, and the changes in fatal injuries—and use references and connectors precisely.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant vocabulary, including “fatal,” “serious,” “slight,” “total,” and “increase rate,” so the reader can recognise the categories being described. However, the range is limited and several word choices or combinations are inaccurate, which sometimes makes the meaning unclear. Phrases such as “the serious people,” “slight name injuries,” and “the total crime statistics slightly rise” do not describe the data naturally. Repetition of “number” and “represent” also limits precision. Use standard table-reporting language and distinguish injuries from people and crime statistics. For example, describe figures as “the number of injuries” or say a category “accounted for” a particular total.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response attempts both simple statements and longer sentences, including “Furthermore, in year 1999 to 2001…” and “However, in year 2002 to 2004…”. However, the range is limited, and frequent errors in sentence structure, agreement, articles, and punctuation make some statements difficult to interpret. Examples include “The table demonstrate,” “it can clearly seen,” and “the serious people almost stable.” Several sentences lack a clear grammatical subject or verb, while full stops and capital letters are inconsistently used, as in “great Britain .the total number…”. Practise building complete sentences with a clear subject and verb, and check agreement and articles. More accurate simple comparisons would be clearer than longer sentences that are not yet controlled.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.