Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-28

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 4.5)

The given table illustrate the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 19998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period. Overall it is clear that great britain - gun and knife crime statistic - 1998 to 2006 had increased, wheares 2006 to 2007 had decreased.

In the context, In [redacted phone] was slightly increased in total 864%, closely followed by in [redacted phone], fatal was 62%, wheares total had 1195%. In [redacted phone], serious was 244%,wheares total had increased in1382%, closely followed by in [redacted phone], fatal was 95%, wheares serious had 392%,while total had slightly increased in 1877%.

Following, in [redacted phone], fatal was 80%, wheares serious had 416%,closely followed by total crime had 2179%. In [redacted phone], serious had 437%, closely followed by slight was 1683%, while total had 2367%. In [redacted phone], total had 3912%, wheares in [redacted phone], fatal had lowested at 49%, while total had 3821%. In [redacted phone], fatal had 58%, than all crime hal slightly decreased.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 3.5

You identify the topic and attempt to describe changes across the years, including the rise in the total to 3,912 in 2004–05 and the fatal-injury figure of 58 in 2006–07. However, the overview is unclear and partly inaccurate: the table does not show that the total decreased from 2006 to 2007, because no total is provided for 2006–07. Several figures are also given with the wrong units, such as “864%” and “62%”; these are counts, not percentages. The response is 139 words, below the required 150. To improve, give a clear overview of the main trends, report the percentage increases accurately, and select key comparisons rather than listing isolated figures.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

The response has a basic structure: an opening and overview are followed by a chronological account, with phrases such as “In 2000-2001” and “Following” helping signal time. This gives the reader some sense of sequence. However, the progression is largely a year-by-year list, and the repeated “whereas,” “closely followed by,” and “while” do not always express a clear comparison. Some sentences combine several figures without explaining their relationship, making the account difficult to follow. Paragraphing is also limited, with the overview and detailed reporting not clearly separated. Group the data by meaningful trends or injury categories, use linking words only when the relationship is accurate, and create distinct overview and detail paragraphs.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “fatal,” “serious,” “slight,” “total,” and “percentage increase,” so the subject is recognisable. However, the range is limited and several word choices or forms are inaccurate or awkward, such as “had lowested,” “all crime,” and “statistic.” Repeated use of “increased,” “closely followed by,” and “whereas” also makes the description repetitive, and “whereas” is often used where no contrast is being made. Spelling and capitalisation errors, including “wheares” and “great britain,” further reduce clarity. Build a more precise set of trend verbs and comparison phrases, and check spelling and word forms before submitting.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

You attempt some longer sentences using clauses linked by “while” and “whereas,” but control is inconsistent, and many sentences contain errors that make the relationships between figures unclear. For example, “In 1998-1999 was slightly increased in total 864%” lacks a clear subject and has an incorrect verb construction; “fatal was 62%” also uses an unsuitable grammatical pattern for reporting a count. There are problems with agreement and sentence boundaries, as in “the table illustrate” and the run-on sequence “244%,wheares total.” Most sentences rely on similar simple reporting patterns, so the range remains limited. Practise accurate structures such as “The total rose to…” and “Fatal injuries stood at…,” and check articles, agreement, and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.