Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-28

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 4.5)

The table presents the crime statistics of gun and knife form 1998 to 2007 in great britain.The table shows us three different types of injuries and wee will talk about these injuries further below.

From 1998 to 2007,there are a lot of injuries.The year 2004-05 is the year with the most injuries where slight injuries took the advantage ,followed by the year 2005-06.We see that there is a shape upsurge of injuries every year.The year with the most serious injuries is the year 2005-06.

The year with the lower injuries is the year 1998-99 where slight injuries are the highest as compared to other injuries.

All things considered,the number of injuries increases every year form 1998-04.By the comparison of 2004-05 to [redacted phone],we see that there is a slight decline in the number of injuries in year 2005-06 as compared to the year 2004-05.The slight injuries are lesser than the other year,where fatal injuries took the advantage.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

You identify some relevant features, including the peak in total injuries in 2004–05, the subsequent decline in 2005–06, and the highest serious-injury figure in 2005–06. However, the response addresses the table only minimally: it gives almost no figures and does not explain the overall increases shown by the data. The claim that injuries rose “every year” is inaccurate, since totals fell from 3,912 to 3,821 in 2005–06, and fatal injuries also fluctuated. The comparison that fatal injuries “took the advantage” in 2005–06 is misleading; slight injuries remained by far the largest category. To improve, give a clear overview of the main trends, support it with selected figures, and distinguish the injury categories accurately.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

The response has a basic sequence: an introduction, a paragraph describing selected years, and a concluding comparison. This gives the reader some sense of organisation. However, progression is limited because ideas are repeated rather than developed: the peak in 2004–05 and decline in 2005–06 appear in both the middle and final paragraphs. Linking phrases such as “All things considered” and “By the comparison” do not always clarify how the points relate, and references such as “the other year” are vague. Group the information into a clear overview and focused comparisons, for example, total injuries over time and differences among injury types. Use precise references to years and categories to make the sequence easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-related vocabulary, including “fatal,” “serious,” “slight,” “decline,” and “increases,” so the main subject is generally recognisable. However, the range is limited and several expressions are inaccurate or unnatural, which sometimes makes the intended comparison unclear. “Took the advantage” is not an appropriate way to describe the largest category, while “shape upsurge” is unclear. “A lot of injuries” is also too informal and imprecise for reporting numerical data. Aim for standard data-description language such as “accounted for the largest share,” “rose sharply,” and “the total reached.” Check spelling and word forms, including “Great Britain” and “from,” to make the report more precise and professional.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences, and the reader can understand several basic comparisons. However, the range of sentence structures is limited, and errors recur in sentence boundaries, articles, agreement, and punctuation. For example, “The table presents the crime statistics … in great britain.The table shows us” runs two sentences together and lacks a space after the full stop. In “there are a lot of injuries,” the present tense is inconsistent with the past-period data, and “the year with the lower injuries” has an incorrect comparative construction. Use past-tense reporting consistently, form comparisons with “fewest” or “lowest,” and check articles and punctuation. More accurate control of these basic patterns would make your meaning clearer.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.