Band 4.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-11-02

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 4.0)

The given table demonstrates the amount of injuries in Great Britain from gun and knife crime between [redacted phone].The injuries are catagorised as fatal, serious and slight.

A cursory glance at the table is adequate enough to represent that maximum injuries has been observed in [redacted phone] in which 3912 people were slightly, 476 were seriously and 49 were fattlely injured.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 3.0

The response identifies the topic and names the three injury categories, and it reports several figures for 2004–2005. However, it does not provide a meaningful overview of the table’s main trends or comparisons, and the claim that this year had the “maximum injuries” is inaccurate: the total was highest in 2004–2005, but the highest serious-injury figure occurred in 2005–2006. The figure 3,912 is the total, not the number of people slightly injured; slight injuries numbered 3,424 that year. The response also omits the overall increases and the changes across the period. At 59 words, it is substantially below the required 150, leaving the task only minimally addressed. Include a clear overview and accurately compare key figures.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

The response has a basic sequence: it introduces the table and categories, then gives a specific observation. This provides a simple starting structure, but the ideas are not developed into a complete summary, and the second sentence combines several figures without clearly distinguishing the total from the injury categories. There is no concluding overview or progression through the years, so the reader cannot follow the main changes in the data. The transition from the introduction to the example is also abrupt. To improve, organise the response into an introduction, an overview of the main trends, and a paragraph comparing selected figures; use clear references such as “the total” and “slight injuries” to show what each number represents.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The response uses some relevant task vocabulary, including “fatal,” “serious,” “slight,” and “injuries,” so the subject is recognisable. However, the range is narrow and several choices are inaccurate or unnatural: “amount of injuries” is not an appropriate collocation for countable events, while “a cursory glance … is adequate enough to represent” is awkward and does not clearly describe a table feature. “Catagorised” and “fattlely” are misspelled, and “slightly” is used where the intended meaning appears to be “slight injuries.” These errors reduce precision, particularly when reporting data. Use standard terms such as “number,” “accounted for,” and “fatal injuries,” and check spelling and word forms before submitting.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response contains a few basic sentence forms, including a simple introductory statement and a relative clause beginning “in which.” Meaning is partly understandable, but grammatical control is uneven. The opening has a missing space after the full stop and an awkward date construction (“from … 1998-2007”); the second sentence has faulty agreement in “maximum injuries has been observed,” and the clause “in which 3912 people were slightly…” does not clearly attach to the intended noun. The response also relies on a small number of structures, with little evidence of controlled comparisons or varied sentence patterns. Practise writing concise data sentences with accurate subjects and verbs, for example, “The total peaked at 3,912 in 2004–2005, when slight injuries reached 3,424.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.