Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-11-04

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The given table illustrates the statistics in Great Britain for gun and knife injuries over the period of nine years starting in 1998. Three categories of injuries are listed in the table with percentage increase over the years.

Overall, fatal injuries accounted for the lowest increase in numbers, while slight injuries accounted for the maximum increase. Additionally, the total number of impairment has shown a gradual increase over the given time period only dipping slightly in the last year.

Firstly, there were only 864 injuries caused by gun and knife violence during 1998 in Great Britain. This number has climbed up over the years till 2005 reaching 3912 impairments. After that time, around 100 injuries decreased by 2007 decreasing the total slightly. Secondly, Fatal injuries were reported to climb up from 49 to 95 reaching peak in 2002. Then it decreased to 68 by 2004 and reached 58 at last.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You provide a relevant overview by identifying that fatal injuries had the smallest percentage rise and slight injuries the largest, and you describe the overall increase in total cases. However, coverage is incomplete: the response gives no account of the serious or slight injury figures, despite these being major categories, and the total trend is not quite accurate. The total rose from 864 in 1998–99 to a peak of 3,912 in 2004–05, then fell to 3,821 in 2005–06; there is no total for 2006–07. Your statement that it decreased “by 2007” therefore misrepresents the table. To strengthen the report, compare the main categories and clarify the final available year.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and a paragraph with selected details. Sequencing is generally clear, and signposts such as “Overall,” “Firstly,” and “Secondly” help the reader follow the points. However, the final paragraph stops after discussing fatal injuries, leaving the overview’s mention of slight injuries and the serious-injury trend unsupported. Some linking is also mechanical, particularly the repeated “Firstly” and “Secondly,” while “After that time” has an unclear reference. Organise the details into clearer comparisons—for example, totals first, then the three injury categories—and use transitions that show contrast or change over time more precisely.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use a reasonable range of task-related vocabulary, including “accounted for,” “percentage increase,” “climbed,” and “reaching peak,” so the main trends are usually understandable. There are, however, several imprecise or unnatural choices. “Impairment” does not mean a count of injuries, and “injuries caused by gun and knife violence” is less direct than the table’s categories. “Maximum increase” is also vague when describing the largest percentage rise. Aim for accurate collocations and consistent terminology, such as “number of injuries,” “total cases,” and “the largest percentage increase.” This would make the report more precise without requiring more elaborate vocabulary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use both simple and more developed sentence forms, including the contrast in “while slight injuries accounted for the maximum increase” and the sequence describing fatal injuries. Meaning is generally clear, but some grammatical errors remain. In “This number has climbed up over the years till 2005 reaching 3912,” the tense and the placement of the time phrase make the sentence awkward; a past-tense form would suit the completed period. “Then it decreased to 68 by 2004 and reached 58 at last” also needs clearer parallel structure and more natural punctuation. There are occasional issues with articles and sentence construction, but they do not usually prevent understanding. Review tense consistency and build cleaner comparisons.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.