Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In recent years, through the internet, air travel, trade and popular culture, globalisation has rapidly increased. Many people believe that the increased interaction between nations through globalisation is a good thing.

Discuss this view and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

Over the past years, countries have come togather and formed a global village through the use of technology and internet. Nations are interacting with each other and globalization has increased on a large scale. Considering its economic, social and international benefits, I believe it can be a great way to increase trade and foster peaceful relations among countries.

In the current world, the innovations of science have brough countries togather. Many countries who could not trade due to the large distances have come together due to air travel. Sea root is no more the only way to share the valuable resources of a country with another. Furthermore, it has also helped the people with desire to see the world without the effort of walking miles. This aspect of technology has not only contributed in the overall economy of the countries but also helped masses interact with the culture and history of distant continents, giving rise to mutual understanding.

Another noteable feature of today's world is its entertainment industries which have alterted the thoughts and beliefs of the new generations on a large scale. The genz, for instance, are rejecting the social norms and growing out of the traditional approaches. For example, unlike the older generations, genz of India and Pakistan are building understanding for eachother 's countries and does not have innate hate for eachother due to political reasons. This generation is making friends on an international scale and bringing innovation to the old system of thinking.

The globalization of countries has also increased the unlikelihood of wars to some extent. Due to fast means of communcations, countries are aware of the ongoing situations in the opposite side of world. For instance, when a war broke in Gaza, the entire world supported the victims with food, shelter and aid. This brotherhood is another advantage of a globalized world.

In conclusion, I would say that globalization can help nations overcome the tension in their relations, bring youth togather across the world and have financial benefits.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction: you view globalisation positively because it can increase trade and encourage peaceful relations. You discuss several relevant effects, including air travel and trade, cultural exchange, international friendships, and support for people affected by conflict. The examples about young people in India and Pakistan and aid for Gaza help make the discussion concrete. This meets the task well, but the discussion is not equally developed: the economic benefits are asserted rather than illustrated with a specific example, and the link between global interaction and a reduced likelihood of war needs more explanation. To strengthen the response, explain how each example supports your view and briefly acknowledge a possible drawback before reaffirming your position.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your view, three body paragraphs present distinct benefits, and the conclusion restates the main position. Paragraphs generally progress logically, and signposts such as “Furthermore,” “For instance,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the argument. Some connections, however, feel mechanical or are not fully explained. For example, the paragraph about entertainment industries moves from changing beliefs to cross-border friendships without clearly showing how one leads to the other. The Gaza example also needs a more explicit link to the claim that globalisation makes wars less likely. Use referencing and transitions to show these relationships, rather than relying mainly on familiar linking phrases.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “mutual understanding,” “international scale,” “political reasons,” and “financial benefits.” These choices help communicate the main ideas, and you attempt some less common expressions. However, several word-choice, collocation, and spelling errors reduce precision: “Sea root” is unclear where “sea routes” is intended, “noteable” is misspelled, and “alterted the thoughts” is an unnatural phrase. “The unlikelihood of wars” is also awkward in this context. Aim for accurate, natural combinations and check spelling carefully. More precise terms such as “cultural exchange,” “international cooperation,” and “reduce the risk of conflict” would make the argument clearer without requiring unnecessarily complex vocabulary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “who,” “when,” and “unlike,” and most of the argument remains understandable. Some grammatical errors persist, particularly with agreement, possessives, and sentence construction. For example, “genz of India and Pakistan … does not have” should use a plural verb, and “eachother 's countries” needs correct possessive spacing and form. In “Many countries who could not trade,” the relative pronoun is not appropriate for countries; use “that” or “which.” The sentence beginning “The genz, for instance” also needs clearer grammatical framing. Review agreement and relative clauses, and proofread punctuation and possessives to improve accuracy while retaining your varied sentence structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.