Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In recent years, through the internet, air travel, trade and popular culture, globalisation has rapidly increased. Many people believe that the increased interaction between nations through globalisation is a good thing.

Discuss this view and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Nowadays, technological advancements has made global interactions easy for the globe seem to be a small village. International trades, internet, and flights have increased in the current years which has brought a positive impact especially in promotion of diversity and unity.

One strong argument why globilisation stand to be a good thing is it promotes diversity and unity. People of different backgrounds can easily bond in planes and trades which promote oneness. For instance, while in universitry, the institution prepared a trip to Malaysia from where we interacted with people of different color, shared ideas, and exchanged contacts which promoted unity. Additionally, globilasation has led to cultural exchange especially via the use of internet. Individuals use internet in their phones and view cultures of different nations through social media platforms such as TikTok, and Instargram. The platforms give one a chance to learn and assimilate how distinguished people cook, dress, and conduct events which cause the cultural exchange. Therefore, I believe that globilisation has brought more benefits to communities as well as nations.

On the other hand, the interaction has drawbacks which include increase in terrorism and crime acts. Malicious people use internet to scam people pretending to be selling goods. For illustration, in the Facebook market, some individuals post products which they do not have only to ask for deposits and ran away. This issue has affected a large number of states men who end up loosing their money. However, this problem do not make the interaction unsuccessful for the benefits outweigh the demerits.

In conclusion, I vividly support that globilisation has brought more good than harm due to its numerous advantages which include diversity, unity and cultural exchange. However, when dealing with the merits is important to note that crimes might occur in the process, but this is just but a drop in the sea.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your response addresses both the positive view and a drawback, and your position—that globalisation brings more good than harm—is clear in the introduction, body and conclusion. The examples of meeting people during a university trip and learning about cultures through social media make the benefits relevant, while the Facebook Marketplace scam illustrates a genuine risk. This meets the task well, but the discussion is uneven: diversity, unity and cultural exchange receive several explanations, whereas the claim about terrorism is introduced without support and the crime example focuses only on online fraud. To strengthen the response further, develop the opposing view with a specific explanation or example, then show more precisely why the benefits outweigh it.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay has a clear overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph supporting globalisation, a paragraph on drawbacks, and a conclusion that restates your view. Linking expressions such as “Additionally,” “On the other hand,” and “However” help readers follow the main stages of the argument. Some connections are less smooth or precise, however. For example, “People of different backgrounds can easily bond in planes and trades” does not clearly explain how trade itself creates personal contact, and “However, this problem do not make the interaction unsuccessful” refers broadly to the preceding example without fully clarifying the contrast. The conclusion also repeats the benefits rather than synthesising the discussion. Use clearer links between each claim and its evidence, and vary the way you refer back to ideas.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic-related vocabulary, including “cultural exchange,” “diversity,” “unity,” “Malicious people,” and “drawbacks.” These choices allow you to discuss both benefits and risks, and the meaning is generally clear. There are, however, several spelling and word-choice errors, including repeated misspellings of “globalisation,” “university,” and “Instagram,” as well as “states men” and “loosing.” Some combinations are also imprecise: “bond in planes and trades” and “increase in terrorism and crime acts” do not sound natural in this context. Aim for accurate spelling and more conventional collocations, and choose vocabulary that describes the relationship between global contact and its effects precisely.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, using structures such as “which has brought a positive impact” and “However, when dealing with the merits is important to note that crimes might occur.” This shows some range, and the main message remains understandable. Some errors in agreement, verb forms, articles and sentence construction reduce accuracy. For example, “technological advancements has made” needs subject–verb agreement, while “which promote oneness” does not agree with its singular reference. The final sentence of the conclusion is also missing a clear subject after “However.” Review agreement and make sure each clause has a complete, correctly formed structure. More consistently accurate complex sentences would improve control without requiring longer or more complicated phrasing.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.