Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-09-26

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In recent years, through the internet, air travel, trade and popular culture, globalisation has rapidly increased. Many people believe that the increased interaction between nations through globalisation is a good thing.

Discuss this view and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

5.5

In recent years, globalisation has become an increasingly prevalent and widely debated issue in contemporary Society. While some individuals argue that the increased interaction between nations through globalisation is a good thing. Although this perspectives have both advantages or disadvantages side, this essay will explore both side before presenting my own opinion.

On the one hand, there are several compelling reasons why some individuals advocate that increasing globalisation is good thing. One of the primary argument is that the globalisation make individual life easy easier and convenient. People Although people can survive in any nation by helps of globalisation. This is largely because every things is easily spread all over the world such as cultures, foods, laws etc. For, instance, individuals celebrated the festivals various festivals due to globalisation like nepalese people celebrate koreans festivals. Consequently, this can have a positive impact on nation. Another noteworthy argument in favor of this perspective is that its facilitate to improve enhance relationship between nation, which can equality in the world.

On the other hand, there are several drawbacks of globalisation. To begain with, the conventional culture are disappear slightly. Nowadays generation individuals preferred new culture for enjoyment. However they avoid conventional culture. furthermore, another disadvantage of globalisation is that its develop the sedentary lifestyle and create a ememy. This is largely because globalisation provide any needed things without big effort. for instance, Individuals offers variety categories of materials living a nations. Different categories of individuals living in one nation, there are several festivals, religion culture and other. If the people dislike or show negative react in other culture its create a ememy of each each other.

In colclusion, both side have their own merits and are supported by reasonable arguments. While golibalisation may offer considerable benefits to rations, it can also provide certain drawbacks. In my view, I believe that globalisation really helps to stay easier and convenient lifestyle and also helps to maintain good relationships between nation.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response addresses all parts of the prompt by discussing both the positive and negative aspects of globalisation and providing a personal opinion in the introduction and conclusion. However, the development of ideas is limited and sometimes unclear due to weak support and language barriers. For example, the arguments regarding cultures spreading and sedentary lifestyles are stated rather than fully extended. The position is clear throughout, but the reasoning often lacks depth and contains sweeping generalisations, such as claiming globalisation 'create a ememy'. These limitations align closely with the Band 5 descriptors, where ideas are somewhat under-developed and limited in scope.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The essay is divided into an introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion, showing a basic structural organisation. However, progression is frequently disrupted by awkward phrasing and mechanical or inaccurate cohesive devices. For instance, the introduction contains a sentence fragment ('While some individuals argue... Although this perspectives...'), which disrupts logical flow. Cohesive markers such as 'To begain with', 'furthermore', and 'In colclusion' are used to signpost sections, but referencing and substitution are often faulty, making relationships between sentences difficult to follow at times. Paragraphing is attempted, but internal cohesion is weak, placing the response firmly at Band 5.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is basic, repetitive, and minimally adequate for the task. The student attempts some less common vocabulary items such as 'prevalent', 'contemporary', and 'sedentary lifestyle', but these are accompanied by frequent word-choice and collocation errors, such as 'ememy' instead of 'enmity', 'every things' instead of 'everything', and 'offers variety categories of materials'. Spelling errors like 'begain' and 'colclusion' also occur. While the meaning can generally be discerned, the noticeable inaccuracies and limited flexibility restrict the lexical score to a Band 5.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writing displays a very limited range of grammatical structures, with frequent errors throughout. While the student attempts complex sentences, these are frequently faulty and ungrammatical, such as 'One of the primary argument is that the globalisation make individual life easy easier and convenient.' There are numerous issues with subject-verb agreement ('its facilitate', 'every things is'), missing articles, and awkward verb forms. Punctuation errors are also present, including sentence fragments. Because errors are frequent and occasionally cause difficulty for the reader, the response warrants a Band 5 for grammar.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.