Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-16
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In recent years, through the internet, air travel, trade and popular culture, globalisation has rapidly increased. Many people believe that the increased interaction between nations through globalisation is a good thing.
Discuss this view and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
During the recent years with the courtesy of internet and globelisation like air travel trade and popular culture and poeple are of the opinion that this is a good for between differnt nations across the world .I personally folly agree with is opinion that with the help of tehcnology and advancement in science is very benificial for everyone in this world.As we all know that today is a world of technology .Acutually in every field of of work education and other industary such as food medicine and agriculture is becoing more rekaibke with the help of globalisation.So other thungs like negociations international relations and forigen policies is becoming more and more smooth and easy to apply for every situations like theart of war climate changes and many other . In other word is would not be wrong so say that globalisation helping under devepoled countaries to make relations and healthy intaractions with developed countries to make their stable at economical level and also at international level .But there are some other things of globalisation which cannot be neglected such as wars on intrtnational level in trades and also gealosy at international just for intance Pakistan and india are the arch eivel of erachother from decades they could make good relations wityh eachother bacause of bad globalisation and worst democray. So it is not easay to get thse coutries on the same page on neutral issue they always want to get eachiother harm at national and intrtnational level and it is one of the most dangerous thing for real world right now because they are both atomic powers and can harm the world bt their disbeliefs on each other.In the conclusion i would sayb thsat globalisation is becoming more powerfull and facilitat many countaries to gain power and stability but with some reasons it could not completely appicabel but overall it is agood thing for future of many nations
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 4.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 4.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You address both the general benefits of globalisation and your own view, which is clearly positive in the opening and conclusion. Relevant points include improvements in medicine, agriculture and education, and the possibility of stronger economic and international relationships for developing countries. You also acknowledge a counterpoint through tensions between India and Pakistan, so the response engages with more than one side of the question. However, several claims are unclear or only briefly explained—for example, the link between globalisation and “theart of war,” and the claim that it has caused poor relations between the two countries. Explain how increased international interaction produces each benefit or problem, and support the example more precisely to develop your ideas fully.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5
The response has a recognisable overall shape: it introduces your position, develops benefits, considers a drawback, and ends with a conclusion. Connectors such as “So,” “In other word,” and “In the conclusion” signal some relationships between ideas. However, the writing is presented as one long paragraph, making the shifts between benefits, international relations and the counterargument difficult to follow. Several transitions are also unclear: “But there are some other things” does not specify the contrast, while “So” introduces a conclusion that is not clearly linked to the preceding point. Use separate paragraphs for the introduction, benefits, counterargument and conclusion, and make each paragraph focus on one main idea with clear links.
Lexical Resource: Band 4.5
You attempt vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “international relations,” “foreign policies,” “economical level” and “atomic powers.” This shows an effort to discuss global issues rather than relying only on basic language. However, spelling errors and inaccurate word choices frequently make the intended meaning difficult to identify, as in “rekaibke,” “gealosy,” “arch eivel” and “bad globalisation.” Some phrases are also unnatural or imprecise, such as “with the courtesy of internet” and “get these countries on the same page on neutral issue.” Choose familiar, accurate expressions before attempting more complex ones, and check spelling carefully. For example, describe globalisation as “increased international interaction” and explain specific effects rather than using unclear labels.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences with linking clauses, including “So other things like negotiations… is becoming…” and the sentence beginning “But there are some other things…”. This shows some range, but control is uneven. Errors in agreement and sentence construction appear in examples such as “international relations… is becoming” and “globalisation helping,” while missing or incorrect articles and prepositions also affect clarity. Several sentences run together without clear punctuation, particularly the long discussion of India and Pakistan, so relationships between clauses are hard to follow. Build accuracy with shorter, complete sentences first, then add subordinate clauses. Check that each sentence has a subject and correctly formed verb, and use full stops to separate distinct ideas.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.