Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-09-19

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The diagram below shows how a mechanical arm works, and how the joints that make up the arm function in the same way as those in a human arm. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Screenshot 2026-06-22 at 12.05.33 PM.png

Student answer (Band 5.0)

To begin with, the mechanical arm has so many features in comparison to the human arm as it can do work faster than humans. The mechanical arm has a shoulder which can up and lowers the arm and it is easy to rotate through the instrument called pivot in addition with it has really well base which is moving very rare. It has really flexible elbow through this it can allow movement comparisingly the work done by humans has a lot of effort they have to adjust themselves according to the trouble in machine.

To add with it, mechanical arm has wrist that has flexible gripper that can easily rotate, whereas humans have to spray paint first than they have to make the holes and then they have to do welding, on the other hand, mechanical arm generate three motors at a time and make a computer in a very precised manner.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response4.5
Coherence and Cohesion5.0
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy4.5
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 4.5

The response attempts to describe the mechanical arm diagram, mentioning key components such as the shoulder, pivot, base, elbow, wrist, gripper, and motors. However, the report includes a large amount of irrelevant or inaccurate comparison with human effort and capabilities, such as claiming humans have to spray paint first before making holes and welding. Furthermore, there is no proper overview provided of how the mechanical arm functions or mirrors the human arm, which is a core requirement of Task 1. The descriptions are often confused, for instance stating that the 'mechanical arm generate three motors at a time'. Consequently, the task is only partially addressed, leading to a band score of 4.5.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The text is divided into two paragraphs, but the overall organization and logical progression are weak. Cohesive devices are used awkwardly or inaccurately, such as 'To begin with', 'in addition with it', and 'To add with it'. The relationship between ideas is often unclear, particularly in the second paragraph where the transition from robotic wrist functions to human tasks is disjointed and confusing. Referencing is also problematic, making it difficult to follow the flow of information. Paragraphing is present, but internal cohesion fails to guide the reader smoothly through the visual data, supporting a band score of 5.0.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is basic and frequently inappropriate or unnatural. Words and phrases like 'up and lowers', 'really well base', 'moving very rare', and 'precised manner' demonstrate significant limitations in lexical choice and word formation. Attempts to use less common vocabulary result in unnatural collocations and errors that occasionally impede understanding, such as 'mechanical arm generate three motors at a time'. Spelling is generally acceptable, but the overall range of vocabulary is narrow and restricted to simple, repetitive terms, corresponding to a band score of 5.0.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 4.5

The response exhibits a very limited range of grammatical structures, relying heavily on basic, repetitive sentence patterns. Attempts at complex sentences often result in severe structural errors and run-on sentences, such as 'The mechanical arm has a shoulder which can up and lowers the arm and it is easy to rotate through the instrument called pivot in addition with it has really well base which is moving very rare.' Subject-verb agreement errors (e.g., 'can up and lowers', 'arm generate') and tense confusion are frequent. These grammatical inaccuracies cause considerable difficulty for the reader, justifying a band score of 4.5.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.