Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-08-26

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Concern for the environment is growing rapidly and more and more people are choosing to be 'eco-tourists' - travelling in responsible, environmentally-friendly ways. As a result, the eco-tourism industry is expanding.

To what extent do you think this is a positive trend?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

With the advancement in every field of life tourism is also expanding but in very positive way .There is a new trend which is increasing day by day that mostly tourists are adopting environment friendly traveling in all over the world. I think this is a great initiative in tourism and shall have great impact on environment.

Mostly individual who loves traveling are transitioning form traditional tourism into eco-friendly because it brings a lot of good energy in surroundings . It also brings people together from different regions on the basis of taste in nature. For instance, people who loves fabulous beaches and incredible sea view always choose Bali and Miami not because there are best places to explore but also it creates friendly environment between tourists.

There is another reason why traveling lovers are adopting eco-tourism is to maintain a healthy relationship between local people . Whenever , tourists visit to a environment friendly site they purchase different products from local residents such as food, flat or transport which is directly benificial for them. For example,whenever tourists visit in Murree

they always stay 2 to 3 days and buy form locals which is profitable deal for locals.

In conclusion, a rapid increase in eco-friendly tourism is one of the best approach for environment.

Actually, it is a positive startup for nature . It would not only profitable for governments but also locals.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response addresses the prompt by discussing the positive aspects of eco-tourism, such as economic benefits for locals. However, the essay is under the 250-word minimum, which limits the depth of the argument. The ideas are somewhat repetitive and lack sufficient development or specific, well-explained examples. While the position is clear, the supporting points—such as the mention of Bali or Murree—are superficial and do not fully explore the 'extent' of the trend. To improve, you should expand on your arguments with more detailed analysis and ensure you meet the minimum word count requirement to allow for a more comprehensive response.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into paragraphs, but the logical progression is sometimes hindered by awkward phrasing and limited use of cohesive devices. While there are some linking words like 'For instance' and 'In conclusion', the transitions between sentences are often mechanical or abrupt. The referencing is occasionally unclear, such as in the second paragraph where the connection between 'good energy' and the benefits of eco-tourism is vague. Improving the variety of cohesive devices and ensuring that each paragraph has a clear, unified focus would significantly enhance the flow of your writing.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for basic communication but lacks the precision and range required for higher bands. There is some repetition of basic terms like 'tourism', 'traveling', and 'environment'. Some word choices are slightly unnatural, such as 'positive startup' or 'profitable deal for locals'. To achieve a higher score, you should aim to use more sophisticated collocations and topic-specific vocabulary related to environmental sustainability and economic impact. Expanding your range of synonyms and using more precise academic terminology will help you convey your ideas more effectively.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay contains a mix of simple and some complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede clarity. Common issues include subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'individual who loves' instead of 'individuals who love'), missing articles, and incorrect preposition usage (e.g., 'visit in Murree'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with comma placement. While the meaning is generally understandable, the frequency of these errors suggests a need for more careful proofreading and a stronger grasp of basic sentence construction and grammatical rules.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.