Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-09-02

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The diagram below shows a town square and surrounding area in 2014 and the plans for development of the area to be completed by 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The maps depict the plan about a surrounding area in city square in past 2014and the strategy to make more sophisticated in 2020 .

Overall, in past there is less number of amenities however for further development process the town square has undergone notable enhancement ,including the transformation of supermarket and local artist gallery moreover it introduces new amenities like covering seat children playgroung and bars and restro .

In the year 2014, the area cover some specific facilities like fish market situated in the northern west side whereas theopposite of it there is townhall which faced the fish market .the infrastructure include essential facilities like bandstand and fountain which is situated in the centre point of this maps .the history museum connected with fish market below the west side and below of it there is library which contain two section of room . the opposite side of library in the northern east part there is fish reataurant located both library and restaurant are connected with eachother.the below of townhall there is a large space of room which is administrative building bee of it in the left side there is a small room for bar area.

According to the maps of 2020 which is plans to developed the area has been seen with the enhancement of large number of amenities even though there is some kind of transformation we can spot like the fish market which is transformed info a sophisticated supermarket ,history museum converted into local artist gallery .however, there is also some notable things like absence of bar and restaurant, library, bandstand ,administrative buildings. but they include and add some other new facilities like plant beds, covering seats ,shops and children playground while certain features have remained unchanged.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response covers the main features of the maps, identifying key changes such as the conversion of the fish market and museum. However, the description of the 2014 layout is somewhat cluttered and lacks a clear, logical progression. While the main trends are identified, some details are inaccurate or confusingly described, such as the claim that the library and restaurant are connected, which is not clearly supported by the visual evidence. The overview is present but could be more concise and focused on the most significant changes to better meet the requirements for a higher band.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The essay is divided into paragraphs, which helps structure the information. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate, such as the repetitive use of 'below of it' or 'the opposite side of'. The flow between sentences is occasionally disjointed, making it difficult for the reader to follow the spatial relationships between the buildings. Referencing is sometimes unclear, and the transition between the 2014 description and the 2020 plan could be smoother to improve the overall logical progression of the report.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks precision and variety. There are several instances of awkward phrasing and word choice, such as 'restro' (informal), 'administrative buildings bee of it', and 'transformed info'. The student relies on basic descriptive language and struggles with accurate collocations when describing the layout (e.g., 'northern west side' instead of 'north-west'). To achieve a higher score, the student should focus on using more precise geographical and descriptive terminology and avoid informal abbreviations.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The response contains a mix of simple and some attempted complex structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors throughout. Issues include incorrect article usage ('the maps', 'the history museum'), subject-verb agreement errors ('the infrastructure include'), and awkward sentence construction ('the area cover some specific facilities'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, with missing spaces after commas and periods. While the meaning is generally understandable, these frequent errors persist and occasionally impede the flow of the text, preventing a higher score in this criterion.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.