Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-09-11
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The diagram below shows a town square and surrounding area in 2014 and the plans for development of the area to be completed by 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
The below diagram illustrate a town square surrounding area between 2014 and 2020 plans for development and reconstructing area completed by 2020.
overall it can be seen that the west side of history museum replaced by local artist's gallery and also the east side of administrative buildings terminated by shops.
In this diagram development area of square town in 2014 the north side fish market and town hall clearly visible while the down south side of fish restaurant and bar located. there is also other thing in the middle of town square found fountain with just near of north east side bandstand can be seen also the west side of library and history museum and east side only administrative buildings located.
The current town square building was build in since 2014 and compare with 2020 there is several things modified shops is found east side of new building however the west side local artist gallery in the middle of town made new seating area along with children playground and plant beds there is also other things noted in the south side of bar and restaurant building build also in the north side of supermarket and town hall located and west side of local gallery developed in the new building 2020.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response covers the main features of the diagram, identifying the key changes between 2014 and 2020. However, the overview is somewhat weak and lacks a clear summary of the most significant trends. While the student identifies the replacement of the museum and the addition of shops, the description of the layout is often confusing and lacks precision. For instance, the phrase 'down south side of fish restaurant' is vague. To reach a higher band, the student should focus on grouping information more logically—perhaps by area or by type of change—rather than listing features in a disjointed manner.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0
The essay is divided into paragraphs, but the internal structure is problematic. The progression of ideas is often unclear, and the use of cohesive devices is mechanical or missing entirely. For example, the transition between the description of the 2014 layout and the 2020 plans is abrupt. There is a lack of linking words to guide the reader through the comparisons. Referencing is also inconsistent, making it difficult to follow which building is being discussed in relation to others. Improved use of signposting language would significantly enhance the flow.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The vocabulary is limited and repetitive, relying heavily on basic directional language ('north side', 'east side'). There are several instances of awkward word choice and incorrect collocations, such as 'terminated by shops' and 'other thing in the middle'. The student struggles to use precise terminology to describe urban development, such as 'demolished', 'converted', or 'extended'. While the meaning is generally conveyed, the lack of variety and the frequent errors in word choice restrict the score to the 5.0 band.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The response contains frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede readability. There are significant issues with verb tense consistency ('was build', 'is found'), subject-verb agreement, and sentence structure. Many sentences are run-on or lack necessary prepositions, such as 'in the middle of town made new seating area'. The range of structures is limited, with few attempts at complex sentences. Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly regarding the use of commas to separate clauses. A focus on basic sentence construction and tense accuracy is essential for improvement.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.