Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-09-29

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The diagram below shows a town square and surrounding area in 2014 and the plans for development of the area to be completed by 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Screenshot 2026-06-22 at 12.20.21 PM.png

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The two maps illustrate the development of a town square and surrounding area from 2014 to the planned 2020.

Overall, the town center became more modern and visitor friendly. The fountain in center remained almost same, but many buildings changed their purposes and new facility were added.

In 2014, on the north side there was a fish market on the left and town hall on the right. In the middle there was a fountain and bandstand on the right side of the fountain. On the west side there were two buildings, history museum in the middle and library in the south-west. On the east side there were administrative buildings and on the south side there was a fish restaurant and a bar.

In 2020, many changes happend. The fish market in the north-west was changed into supermarket, while the town hall remained same. The bandstand was removed and two picnic benches were built in the place. The fountain in center stayed the same. On the east side, the administrative building were divided into small shops. On the south side, the fish restaurant and bar were converted into cafes and restaurants. On the west side, the history museum was replaced by a artist gallery. Also, a childrens playground and more customer setting were added near the center.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response7.0
Coherence and Cohesion7.0
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

The response successfully covers all parts of the task by reporting the main features of the town square in 2014 and the proposed changes for 2020. The overview effectively captures the general trend that the area becomes more modern and visitor-friendly. Key transformations, such as the replacement of the fish market with a supermarket and the administrative buildings with shops, are clearly highlighted. Comparisons between the two maps are drawn effectively, and details such as the retention of the fountain and town hall are accurately noted. The response meets all the requirements for a well-rounded Task 1 performance, achieving a band score of 7.0.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The text is logically organised with a clear overall progression. It begins with an introductory sentence, followed by a concise overview paragraph, and then separates the body into distinct paragraphs for the 2014 map and the 2020 map. Cohesive devices such as 'In 2014', 'In 2020', and 'while' are used appropriately to guide the reader through the spatial changes. Paragraphing is used sufficiently and appropriately, creating a readable and well-structured response. The organisation supports a clear flow of information throughout.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The vocabulary used is generally adequate and appropriate for describing maps, including terms like 'supermarket', 'administrative buildings', 'playground', and 'converted'. The student attempts some less common vocabulary, such as 'visitor friendly', 'purposes', and 'replaced'. However, there are a few lexical inaccuracies and missing plural forms, such as 'artist gallery' instead of 'artists' gallery' and 'customer setting' instead of 'customer seating'. Despite these minor flaws, the lexical range is sufficient to communicate the information clearly.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

The response demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, such as the use of subordinate clauses with 'while' and prepositional phrases for location. There are several grammatical errors and omissions, including missing articles ('in center', 'to the south-west'), subject-verb agreement issues ('administrative building were'), and spelling or word form errors ('happend', 'new facility were added'). While these errors are noticeable, they do not impede communication, allowing the reader to follow the spatial descriptions easily.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.