Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-11-06

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Concern for the environment is growing and more and more people are choosing to recycle. But some people suggest that recycling is not enough. They believe we need to consume less.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Environment is growing more and more individuals are choosing it again and again. Although, few ones argue that recycling is not more convinent than consuming less amount of resources. I firmly believe that recycling is a more beneficial because people may use lot of time. in this essay we discuss both of the views.

To begin with, recycling is more accurate for environment however it gives us option to use the product again and again like in the plastic and polythene bags we decompse these products in the numerous ways it is substantial and helps us in the crucial way. moreover, it is widely useful to grow crops in the organic method we made pesticides an the seeds by the recycling. on the contrast. To cite an example, in the year 2009 in canada authorities can conducted reasearch and assert recycling helps to grow natural environment in many of the cities of the canada and gave 30% rise in the agriculture industury

On the contrary, many of the other individual argue that consuming less is more develop method. whereas it is because if we use fewer and fewer products than avaliability of the many of resource becomes risen . Although, it mainly effects on the pricing of the things. numerous numbers of the products becomes cheaper because on the basis of easy avaliability , so it effect on the shortlisted thighs and gave releif to so many other individuals.

In conclusion, from my vision recycling is more reliable method to exrabate the amount product using again and again although, it significantly effects on the agriculture or so many cother commercial methods

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You address both views and state a preference for recycling, so the response is relevant to the question. However, the position is not consistently clear: the introduction says recycling is “more beneficial” because people “may use lot of time,” while the conclusion refers to its effects without clearly comparing it with consuming less. The supporting ideas are also limited or unclear. For example, the claim that recycling helps grow crops through pesticides and seeds is difficult to follow, and the Canada example is asserted rather than explained. Develop each view with a clear reason and a specific, credible example, then explain why your preferred approach is more effective overall.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion, which gives it some basic organisation. The reader can generally identify when you move from recycling to consuming less. However, progression within paragraphs is often unclear, and linking expressions are sometimes inaccurate or mechanical. For instance, “On the contrast” appears in the recycling paragraph without a clear contrasting point, while “Although” begins the introduction and conclusion in ways that do not complete a contrast. Ideas such as lower consumption leading to greater resource availability and cheaper products need clearer connections. Use topic sentences, arrange each paragraph around one main claim, and link examples explicitly to that claim.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

You attempt vocabulary related to the topic, including “resources,” “organic method,” “availability,” and “agriculture industry.” However, the range is limited and many word choices, collocations, and spellings make the meaning difficult to follow. Examples include “recycling is more accurate for environment,” “exrabate the amount product,” and “shortlisted thighs,” which do not express the intended ideas clearly. There are also repeated general terms such as “products,” “individuals,” and “method.” Build a more reliable set of topic phrases and check spelling and word forms. Prefer precise expressions such as “reduce resource consumption,” “reuse materials,” and “lower demand may reduce prices,” ensuring each phrase fits its sentence.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including clauses beginning with “Although” and “because,” but control is inconsistent. Several sentences are incomplete or awkwardly joined: “Although, few ones argue…” and “Although, it significantly effects…” leave the contrast unfinished, while “in this essay we discuss both of the views” shifts into an unsupported first-person plural. Errors in articles, agreement, and sentence boundaries also occur, as in “in the numerous ways” and the long sentence beginning “To cite an example.” These problems sometimes make relationships between ideas hard to understand. Practise complete sentence patterns, especially contrast clauses, and use full stops to separate claims from examples.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.