Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Concern for the environment is growing and more and more people are choosing to recycle. But some people suggest that recycling is not enough. They believe we need to consume less.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

There is an nogiong discussion about environment, some people preffer recycle. While others argue that resusing is not adequate, they beleive that we consume limited. In this essay I will explain both viewponts because each point is logical, also give my comment regarding the conerning topic.

On the one hand, there are significant number of countries across the world who installed high quality machines for reusing the objects, because this one of the best way tackle the waste and make these siutable for usage with reasonable cost. Therefore, they buy used stuff such as plastic bottles, and steel goods. For example, Germany pay a good price to collect plastic bottles through the machines which are put up across the cities. As a result, they reuse the material and keep their ecosystem clean and healthy, In my opinion this the easiest way to overcome the waste problem and recycle the items with low price.

On the other hand, the limited usage of material is not a suitable way to tackle the current burning issuse related to ecosystem. If the countries control their consumption in next few years they can face this hurdle because the entire population use plastic, clothes or other types of goods, afterward leave those thing in the garbage. For example, Indian officials banned the plastic bags for groceries and other kind of shopping, but they are still in trouble to reomove the current palstic waste from the environment. Therefore, this is not a sustainable solution for strong and natural atmosphere.

In conclusion, the prime solution for hygenic ecosystem the countries must have a strong recycle system, which is beneficial for state and individuals both, while less usage of products can cause any issues in the future for public and environment.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You address both views and state a clear preference for recycling, especially in the conclusion, where you call it the “prime solution.” The examples of Germany’s bottle-return machines and India’s plastic-bag ban are relevant to the topic. However, the discussion is only partial: the case for consuming less is presented mainly as ineffective, rather than explaining why people support reducing consumption or acknowledging how it could prevent waste at its source. Your position is also not fully clear in the introduction, which says you will explain both views but does not state your opinion. Develop each side with a reason and explain how your examples support it; make your position explicit from the beginning.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable introduction, two body paragraphs presenting opposing views, and a conclusion, so the reader can follow its broad structure. “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” help signal these stages. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear: the first body paragraph moves from recycling systems to low cost and then to your opinion without fully connecting those points. Some linking is mechanical, and references such as “this one” and “these” do not clearly identify what they refer to. The conclusion also introduces a claim about future issues that has not been explained. Use clearer links between claims and examples, and ensure each paragraph develops one central point.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “ecosystem,” “consumption,” “plastic waste,” and “sustainable solution,” which helps communicate the subject. However, the range is limited and several noticeable spelling and word-choice errors make parts difficult to read, such as “preffer,” “beleive,” “issuse,” and “reomove.” Some phrases are also unnatural or imprecise: “reusing the objects,” “limited usage of material,” and “strong and natural atmosphere” do not express the intended ideas clearly. Aim for accurate, natural collocations and check spelling carefully. More precise terms such as “recycling materials,” “reduce consumption,” and “protect the environment” would make your argument clearer and more appropriate to the task.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including clauses introduced by “because,” “while,” and “if,” and the overall meaning is usually recoverable. However, the range is limited, and complex sentences often contain errors that make the reader pause. For example, “there are significant number of countries” is missing an article, while “because this one of the best way tackle the waste” has several missing grammatical elements. There are also problems with agreement and verb forms, as in “Germany pay” and “the entire population use.” Sentence boundaries and punctuation are sometimes faulty, particularly where a comma joins complete ideas. Practise building accurate sentences first, then add subordinate clauses and check articles, agreement, and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.