Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Concern for the environment is growing and more and more people are choosing to recycle. But some people suggest that recycling is not enough. They believe we need to consume less.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In todays industrial world, there is a lot of waste being produced which is growing concern for enviroment which had lead to methods like recycling to reuse the waste it but some people still argue that recycling is not enough and we need to reduce the consumption as well. I believe that both views have their own points and there should be a tradeoff between choosing more recycling and reducing consumption depending on the availability of replacements or need of different products and their affects on environment.

Some products in today's world are necessary for everyperson which may include glass kitcheware for daily use.These things donot have a suitable replacement for common people and these types of products when get buried in earth can cause damage to environment but we cannot reduce their consumption as they are a critical part of our life so our solution for such products is recycling them to reduce their impact.

Similarly, we also have products like plastic bottles which causes more severe environment damage as well but they are not a very essential part of our life and there are other replacements as well so if we try to reduce them then it would cause a lot less issues. Hence these types of products can be consumed as less as possible while recycling them as well if used.

So in my opinion the choice between these two options is more dependant on what product are we talking about. Hence different circumstances, anyone of the two views can be a better solution to help our environment.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You address both views and give a position: recycling is appropriate for necessary products, while reducing use is preferable for less essential items such as plastic bottles. This is relevant to the question, and the examples help explain your distinction. However, the discussion is only partly developed. The case for recycling focuses mainly on glass kitchenware, while the reasons why people should consume less are stated briefly and not supported with a specific example or wider explanation. Your conclusion repeats the conditional position but does not add much synthesis. To strengthen the response, explain the environmental benefits and limitations of each approach more fully, and make your overall recommendation clearer—for example, whether reducing consumption should generally take priority, with recycling as a complementary measure.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, one paragraph about recycling, one about reducing consumption, and a concluding opinion. Linking expressions such as “Similarly,” “Hence,” and “So in my opinion” make the progression easy to follow. However, the organisation is somewhat mechanical, and the two body paragraphs follow nearly identical patterns without developing a broader comparison. Some references are unclear, particularly “these things” and “these types of products,” because the reader must infer exactly which products are meant. The opening sentence also carries several ideas at once, making the main point harder to follow. Use clearer topic sentences and more precise references, and connect the examples explicitly to the two views and your final position.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “recycling,” “consumption,” “replacements,” and “environmental damage,” and the reader can generally understand your meaning. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “critical part of our life” and “depending on the availability of replacements.” However, the range is limited and some word choices or collocations are inaccurate or awkward, including “glass kitcheware,” “tradeoff between choosing more recycling,” and “causes more severe environment damage.” Spelling and word-form errors such as “enviroment,” “dependant,” and “affects” also reduce accuracy. Build a more precise set of topic phrases and check spelling and collocations so your ideas sound natural and exact.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including clauses with “which,” “as,” and “if,” and your meaning is usually recoverable. However, control is inconsistent, especially in longer sentences. For example, “which is growing concern” is missing an article, and “which had lead to methods” has an incorrect verb form. There are also agreement and sentence-structure problems in “products like plastic bottles which causes” and “when get buried in earth.” Missing spaces after full stops and inconsistent punctuation further affect readability. Aim to make each sentence complete and manageable, then check articles, subject–verb agreement, and verb forms. More accurate complex sentences would help you express the comparisons without losing control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.