Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-06

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Concern for the environment is growing and more and more people are choosing to recycle. But some people suggest that recycling is not enough. They believe we need to consume less.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Clean surroundings and fresh atmosphere is essential for human health. in addition to that this is equally significant for other creatures for instance animals and birds.in order to attain this ideal environment some of people suggest to recycled the products while some argued that consufeming less is way better then recycling.

lets start with the idea of recycling: it is high time to protect over surroundings,environment and even universe from all kind of pollution ( noise, air ,dust) .

we need to recycled the items which can be reuse easily like water bottles, oil container and so on. because this method help may help to reduce the asscive use of fuels which are being used in making the plactic products. recycling items of plactic is great idea of attaining pullotant free environment.

consuming less can also help regarding the idea of growing surrondings.there is not a single doubt about that lots of packaging are being used to cover the eatable products. these items are more favorite among the young generation.the problem here is that the after eating the product the raper didn't recycled.every one should consume such products less as much as they can. because when the demand of these item get reduced less packaging material being used.

in my opion having concern about growing surroundings is a singnificantly important for himan life and other creatures of the universe.

both recycling and less consuming the products are equally important to attain the pure environment.both approaches should be promoted in this regard.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses the main task by discussing both views on recycling and consuming less, along with providing a personal opinion. However, the treatment of the ideas remains limited and under-developed. For instance, the discussion on recycling touches upon reducing fuel use and plastic waste, but points are presented briefly without clear extension or concrete examples from personal experience. Similarly, the section on consuming less mentions packaging and wrappers, yet the argument lacks sufficient elaboration. The position is stated towards the end where the writer suggests that both approaches are important, but the overall development fits the descriptive profile of presenting relevant ideas that are not fully expanded.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

There is some basic organisation in the text, with an introduction, body paragraphs addressing each viewpoint, and a concluding stance. However, there is no clear overall progression due to abrupt transitions and mechanical cohesive devices, such as 'lets start with the idea of recycling' and 'in addition to that'. Paragraphing is attempted, but sentences often feel disjointed rather than logically sequenced. Referencing is also occasionally unclear, as seen in phrases like 'the raper didn't recycled', which disrupts the flow and makes it difficult for the reader to follow the logical development of ideas from one sentence to the next.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is limited but minimally adequate for the task, allowing the writer to convey basic concepts related to the environment. There are numerous noticeable errors in word choice, spelling, and word form throughout the text, such as 'consufeming', 'over surroundings' instead of 'our surroundings', 'pullotant' instead of 'pollutant', and 'himan' instead of 'human'. Additionally, collocation is weak in expressions like 'growing surroundings'. These errors cause some difficulty for the reader and restrict the lexical score, as the range is constrained and terms are frequently misspelled or misused.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writer demonstrates a limited range of grammatical structures, relying mostly on simple sentences alongside some faulty attempts at complex ones. Frequent errors are present in basic grammar, including subject-verb agreement issues like 'Clean surroundings and fresh atmosphere is essential', article omissions, and incorrect verb forms such as 'suggest to recycled' and 'material being used' instead of 'material is used'. Punctuation and capitalization are also erratic, with missing spaces after punctuation marks and uncapitalized sentence beginnings. These frequent errors in basic structures cause constant difficulty and hesitation for the reader.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.