Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-13
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Concern for the environment is growing and more and more people are choosing to recycle. But some people suggest that recycling is not enough. They believe we need to consume less.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
It is a fact that the environment is escalating and more and more citizens are choosing to recycle .Some people says recycling is the way to fight against with this situation , whereas others suggests they need to consume less . I shall discuss both perspective .I personally believe that a joint effort in needed by all.
The main reason why some people are agree with recycling to save environment because it's a verified process, where the non-imperishable products are prepared to use again and again .That helps the environment and soil.Plastic bottle are one of the imperishable product which hampared and prevent the growth of water eco-system, it also damage the process of soil fertility enhancement.By recycling it we are able to prevent and stop the spreading of it in environment .
On the other hand , those who believe recycling is not enough for save environment but also we need to focus on consume,give the following reason. If we are aware about the use of non- imperishable products and find a substitute products, In contrast of using non-imperishable products we use perishable products give us a releif from environment pollution .
I believe that both sides should extend hands to save the environment from pollution.As it is , recycling the non-imperishable products or reduce the use of it .Because of both are important to save the environment .
To summarise, enhance recycling with a proper planned way and try to decrease the use of non-imperishable ,non recyclable products which hampared the environment and eco system.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You address both views and state a clear overall position: “a joint effort is needed by all.” The recycling paragraph gives a relevant example of plastic bottles and their effects, while the final paragraph reiterates that recycling and reducing use both matter. However, the discussion is only partly developed. The case for recycling is explained more fully than the case for consuming less, which is presented mainly as replacing non-perishable products with perishable ones. This distinction is unclear and does not explain how reduced consumption would help. To strengthen the response, develop each view with a specific, accurate example and explain the link between the example and your position.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, your opinion, and a conclusion. Transitions such as “On the other hand” and “To summarise” help signal the direction of the discussion. Overall, the ideas can be followed, but connections are sometimes mechanical or unclear. For example, “I believe that both sides should extend hands” is followed by a fragment beginning “As it is,” and the relationship between these sentences is difficult to interpret. The recycling paragraph also moves from plastic bottles to soil fertility without clearly linking the points. Use complete topic sentences and clearer references, and make each paragraph progress through one main idea and its explanation.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “recycle,” “soil fertility,” “eco-system,” and “pollution,” which helps establish the subject. There are also attempts at less common expressions, such as “verified process” and “substitute products.” However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or repetitive, and some errors make the meaning difficult to follow. “The environment is escalating” does not express the intended idea, while “non-imperishable” appears repeatedly where you seem to mean non-biodegradable or non-recyclable. Spelling errors such as “hampared” and “releif” also reduce accuracy. Build a more precise set of environmental terms and check that each word fits its context.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a contrast structure with “whereas” and a conditional sentence beginning “If we are aware…”. However, control is inconsistent, and errors in agreement, articles, verb forms, and sentence boundaries sometimes make the message hard to understand. Examples include “Some people says,” “others suggests,” and “Plastic bottle are,” where the subject and verb do not agree. The sentence beginning “If we are aware” does not form a clear complete conditional, and “Because of both are important” is not grammatically complete. Practise accurate subject–verb agreement and complete sentence patterns before adding more complex clauses; careful punctuation would also help separate ideas.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.