Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-25

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Concern for the environment is growing and more and more people are choosing to recycle. But some people suggest that recycling is not enough. They believe we need to consume less.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In the 21st century, people want to live in a clean environment. Clean enviornment can be achieved through recycling. But my poing of view, recycling is not enough for a healthy environment. We need to consume less for a better life.

Firstly, if we consume more then we face a lot of problems. Food shortage is the main problem in this world. Population are increasing day-by-day. The government does not sincere how to eliminate this type of threat. Secondly, a lot of wastage become the cause of many horrific diseases. Developed countries waste a lot of consumable products. These products become a source of climate change in different areas. Climate change is the root cause of bad environment. Every year hundred of people died due to suffer of bad environment.

Secondly, people must follow the pattern to save the product on the basis of less consumption and leave the pattern of wastage the products. This type of pattern must be adopted in developed countries. The United Nations must be introduced different schemes that fruitful for developing economies in terms of environment. At this time, developing economies bear a heavy loss due to bad environment that came from developed country as like China and India. The government must be followed the pattern of recycling. Plastic products are harmful for environment. The government must be banned plastic made products.

In conclusion, recycling is not enough for a good environment. People should be followed the pattern of less consuming. This type of pattern is bringing the revolutionized in the world under the concern of environment.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response4.5
Coherence and Cohesion5.0
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You give a clear overall opinion that consuming less is necessary and mention recycling, plastic, food shortages and environmental damage. However, the discussion is weighted heavily towards reducing consumption: the benefits of recycling are not explained, so one part of the task is only minimally addressed. Several claims, such as food shortage being the main problem and developed countries causing climate change, are asserted without clear explanation or a relevant example. Your suggestions about government schemes and banning plastic are relevant, but their connection to the two views is not fully developed. To strengthen the response, explain how recycling helps, then compare its limits with reduced consumption and support each point with a specific example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has an introduction, body paragraphs and a conclusion, and signposting such as “Firstly” and “In conclusion” helps readers identify the main stages. However, the overall progression is not always clear. The second body paragraph begins “Secondly” but shifts between consumption, international schemes, recycling and plastic bans without showing how these points connect. Some links are repetitive or imprecise, and references such as “this type of threat” and “this type of pattern” do not clearly identify the idea being discussed. Organise each paragraph around one main point, use topic sentences to guide the reader, and make the relationship between examples and claims explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “food shortage,” “climate change,” “consumable products” and “recycling,” which makes the subject clear. However, the range is limited and several phrases are repeated, particularly “pattern,” “bad environment” and “this type of.” Some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unclear, such as “save the product,” “fruitful for developing economies” and “the revolutionized.” Spelling errors such as “enviornment” and “poing” also reduce accuracy. Aim for more precise environmental vocabulary and check common word partnerships; for example, describe reducing waste or conserving resources rather than using vague phrases.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and longer sentences, and the main message is generally understandable. However, errors occur frequently in verb forms, agreement, articles and sentence construction, sometimes making relationships between ideas difficult to follow. Examples include “Population are increasing,” “The government does not sincere,” “hundred of people died,” and “The government must be followed.” The final sentence, “This type of pattern is bringing the revolutionized,” is also structurally unclear. Practise forming accurate subject–verb combinations and modal constructions, such as “the government must follow” or “the government should introduce.” Build longer sentences from a clear main clause, then check agreement and verb form.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.