Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-07-25
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The charts below show the number of French adults whose parents spoke a French regional language to them when they were children and the number who speak a French regional language to their own children.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.
Number of adults (in thousands) whose parents spoke a regional language to them in childhood
Student answer (Band 5.5)
The given graph illustrates the number of adults whose parents spoke a regional language to them in childhood. There are different languages given in the graph that represents habitually spoken language and occasionally spoken. Also the number of adults whose parents speak a regional language to their own children.
There is a huge difference in the language Asatian can be speak by 600 people and about 370 people speak spoke occasionally. Then it come to Occitan it’s same as Asatian. However occasionally spoken people are about one million. The given graph demonstrates reduction in number of people spoke languages. Then comes to Breton there people are about 370 whereas occasionally spoken people are 500. Creole and Corsican has minor difference in both languages that there is slightly difference in their languages.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response fails to meet the minimum word count requirement of 150 words, which significantly impacts the task achievement score. Furthermore, the report lacks a clear overview of the main trends and fails to accurately describe the data provided in the charts. The analysis of the figures is confusing, particularly the reference to 'one million' for Occitan, which does not align with the provided data. The response does not adequately compare the two charts (parents speaking to children vs. adults speaking to their own children), resulting in an incomplete and underdeveloped response that does not fully address the requirements of the prompt.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay is divided into two short paragraphs, but the logical progression of ideas is weak. The transition between sentences is often abrupt, and the use of cohesive devices is limited and sometimes inaccurate (e.g., 'Then it come to Occitan'). The referencing is unclear, making it difficult for the reader to follow the comparison between the different languages and the two distinct categories of data. The lack of a clear structure and the failure to group information logically hinder the overall flow of the report.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
The vocabulary is quite limited and repetitive. There are several instances of awkward phrasing and word choice errors, such as 'Asatian can be speak' and 'occasionally spoken people'. The student struggles to use precise terminology to describe statistical data, relying on basic descriptors. To improve, the student needs to incorporate a wider range of vocabulary related to trends, comparisons, and data description, and pay closer attention to word forms and collocations to ensure the language is natural and accurate.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The response contains frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede communication. There are issues with subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'Creole and Corsican has'), verb forms (e.g., 'can be speak'), and sentence structure. The range of grammatical structures is very limited, consisting mostly of simple sentences with errors. There is little evidence of complex sentence structures, and punctuation is inconsistent. To reach a higher band, the student must focus on mastering basic sentence construction and increasing the variety of grammatical forms used, while reducing the frequency of errors.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
