Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 4.5 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-09-24
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In some societies, stress is now regarded as a major problem, and it is thought that people suffer from more stress than they did in the past. However, others feel that the amount of stress people have today is exaggerated. They say that previous generations were under more pressure, but the idea of suffering from stress did not exist.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
Student answer (Band 4.5)
These days, there is ongoing debate among people regarding stress, its play a crucial impact in our daily life. It is possible to claim that some societies, stress is now regarding as a major problem, and it is thought that people suffer from more stree than they did in the past. In my opinion I partialy agree with this assesion In this eassy I shall explain my point of views by analyzing the various prospectives. One of the most frequently cited argument in favor of stress is that its paly a crucial impact in over daily life Furthermore, the impact of anxiety extends beyond just individual level, Diversity is the beauty of nature and give exposure to new horizon affecting society as a whole. Moreover If offers offers generous benefits such as it improving communication skills and ability to think logically lastly awareness compaign brings comfort to life. More indeed, reduce human impact. However it is also important to consider the potential pitfall associated with it. Those who agrue have a different views, according to them is learn about past gives a glimps a feature. Secondly, it is also concern that sharing of thoughs and ideas to less the stress. Thirdly, obstacle to overcome and reach over goals. Lastly it will make people curious, curosity is one of the grestest quality of human being, which makes ways for innovation and discovery. In conclude, I concide that stress is a integral part in the development of society. I would srrongly recommend that stress is not the solution so daily excercise and walk. government and society should work together, only by addressing these challenges head-on we can hope to achieve a sustainable balance in the future.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 4.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 4.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 4.0 |
| Overall | 4.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
The response attempts to discuss both views regarding stress and give a personal opinion, meeting the minimum length requirement. However, the development of ideas is heavily hindered by severe language fragmentation and disjointed phrasing. While phrases like 'stress is now regarding as a major problem' touch upon the prompt, the arguments quickly devolve into disconnected clauses and irrelevant tangents regarding nature, diversity, and innovation. The writer's position is partially stated ('I partialy agree with this assesion'), but it is not consistently supported throughout the essay due to the lack of coherent reasoning. Overall, the response addresses the task only partially and the ideas remain largely under-developed and unclear, aligning best with Band 5.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.0
The organisational structure of the essay is highly problematic. Although the writer attempts to use sequence markers such as 'One of the most frequently cited argument', 'Furthermore', 'Moreover', and 'Secondly', these cohesive devices are frequently misused and applied mechanically, failing to guide the reader through a logical progression of ideas. Paragraphing is poorly handled, with a single massive block of text containing disparate thoughts that make it difficult to follow the central arguments. Referencing is often unclear, and transitions between sentences feel abrupt and disjointed. Consequently, the overall arrangement lacks clear progression, fitting the Band 4 descriptors.
Lexical Resource: Band 4.0
The vocabulary used is basic, repetitive, and often inaccurate, which severely strains the reader's understanding. The student frequently misuses common words and word forms, such as 'its play a crucial impact', 'assesion' instead of 'assessment', 'prospectives' instead of 'perspectives', and 'glimps a feature' instead of 'glimpse of the future'. There are also numerous spelling and collocation errors throughout the text (e.g., 'curosity', 'concide', 'integral' spelled as 'intergral'). While there is a minimal attempt to use topic-related vocabulary like 'stress', 'anxiety', and 'society', the overall lexical control is limited, placing this response firmly in Band 4.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.0
Grammatical control is extremely weak throughout the response. The text contains a very limited range of accurate structures, and almost every sentence features noticeable errors in basic grammar, subject-verb agreement, tense consistency, and punctuation. Examples include 'stress, its play a crucial impact', 'stress is now regarding', 'If offers offers generous benefits', and 'stress is not the solution so daily excercise and walk.' Complex structures are rarely attempted, and when they are, they are heavily flawed. Errors are frequent and often obscure the intended meaning, matching the criteria for a Band 4 score.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.