Band 4.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-27

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In some societies, stress is now regarded as a major problem, and it is thought that people suffer from more stress than they did in the past. However, others feel that the amount of stress people have today is exaggerated. They say that previous generations were under more pressure, but the idea of suffering from stress did not exist.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.

Student answer (Band 4.0)

Nowadays stress has become the focus of communities main concern, more and more individuals is suffering from stress these days than they did in the past. Some people contend that stress is now overstated and former generations faced more pressure but they didn`t bother. this essay intends to analyse both perspectives , I however , side with the former view.

There are many arguments given by those who supports that stress is just a overrated subject. in the past people didn`t have the access to technology . t6hey

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response3.0
Coherence and Cohesion4.0
Lexical Resource4.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy4.5
Overall4.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 3.0

The response shows awareness of the topic and gives a position: “I however, side with the former view.” It also begins to introduce the opposing argument by saying that earlier generations “didn’t have the access to technology.” However, the task asks you to discuss both views and explain your own opinion, and neither side is developed with reasons, examples, or relevant evidence. The response stops mid-sentence, so the reader cannot see a complete argument or a conclusion. The required minimum of 250 words is not met; this leaves too little space to address the task meaningfully. To improve, explain why modern life may create stress, why past generations may have faced greater pressure, and support your view with specific examples.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.0

There is a basic attempt to organise the response: the opening introduces the issue and signals an opinion, followed by the start of a paragraph about people who consider stress exaggerated. Phrases such as “Some people contend” and “in the past” help indicate the direction of the discussion. However, the ideas do not progress into a complete essay, and the final fragment, “t6hey,” interrupts the flow. The opening also combines several points in one long sequence, while punctuation around “I however” and “both perspectives” makes the connections harder to follow. Use separate paragraphs for the two views and your opinion, and connect each claim to an explanation or example before moving on.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The response uses some relevant topic vocabulary, including “stress,” “pressure,” “technology,” and “overstated,” and attempts more formal phrasing with “contend” and “perspectives.” This gives the reader a general sense of the subject. However, several choices are awkward or imprecise: “communities main concern” does not express the intended idea naturally, and “they didn’t bother” is too vague to explain how earlier generations responded to pressure. There are also spelling and word-form slips, including “t6hey” and “individuals is.” Aim for accurate collocations and more precise language, such as describing stress as a “major concern” and saying that people “may not have recognised or discussed it.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

You attempt both a compound opening and a complex sentence, for example, “Some people contend that stress is now overstated and former generations faced more pressure.” This shows some ability to link clauses, but control is inconsistent. In “more and more individuals is suffering,” the plural subject requires a plural verb; “those who supports” also has incorrect subject–verb agreement. Article use is faulty in “a overrated subject,” and the opening sentence has unclear punctuation around “I however.” The response is too short to demonstrate a sustained range of structures, and the unfinished final fragment further limits evidence of control. Practise checking agreement, articles, and sentence boundaries, then use a mix of accurate simple and complex sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.