Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-28

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In some societies, stress is now regarded as a major problem, and it is thought that people suffer from more stress than they did in the past. However, others feel that the amount of stress people have today is exaggerated. They say that previous generations were under more pressure, but the idea of suffering from stress did not exist.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

These days it is commonly seen that every one is experiencing some sort of stress some people argue that nowadays stress level has been increased compared to the past while others refuse it, believing that people in the past were under under high pressure. I this essay, I will elaborate on both sides of the argument and present evidence in support of stand.

To begin with, one of the aspects that people often talk about stress is that individuals suffer from more stress than previous generations. To explain it, tecknology takes place in the lives of modern generations, and it encourage people to become stressed all times. Today's youngsters spend their time in indoor activities like scrolling social media content, and they do not prefer to taking part in outdoor activities, wchich becomes the one main significant reason of increasing their anxiety issues. For instance, a group of students who are freely allowed to spend time in using mobile phones playing indoor games often experienced more stress compared to a group who spend more time in outoor activities. Consequently, modern people suffer from more stress they they did in the past.

In contrast, there are some people who deny this and think that older generation were under more stress. In this regard I would say that it bears some truth. For example, in the past there were not availability of various techonolgical instruements, due to which those individuals performed all the task by themselve, and it enhaces the pressure and tentions of completing the tasks timely.

In conclusion, despite that fact that previous individuals do not familier with the idea of suffering. I would personally support the view that nowdays people suffer from more stress compared to the previous generations because modern individuals has less time for sharing thoughts and spendig time in outdoor activities.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You address both views and state your own position: you argue that modern people experience more stress, while acknowledging that earlier generations faced pressure from doing tasks without technology. This gives the response a relevant central argument. However, the two sides are not developed equally. The point about older generations is brief and does not explain clearly what kinds of pressure they faced or how these compare with modern stress. The example about students and phone use supports your first view, but its claim is broad and the comparison is not fully explained. Your conclusion repeats your opinion, though the opening position is difficult to identify because of unclear wording. Develop each view with a specific explanation and make your position clear from the introduction.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Transitions such as “To begin with,” “In contrast,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the main stages. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear. The first body paragraph moves from technology to indoor activities and then to a student comparison without fully connecting the steps. Some linking is mechanical, and references such as “it” in “it encourage people” do not clearly identify what is meant. The conclusion also begins with an incomplete construction, which interrupts the flow. Use clearer links between each claim and its explanation, and ensure each paragraph develops one main point in a logical sequence.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “stress,” “pressure,” “anxiety,” “previous generations,” and “outdoor activities.” These terms make the general subject clear, and phrases such as “under more stress” are appropriate. However, the range is limited and several word-choice, collocation, and spelling problems reduce precision: “technology takes place in the lives” is unnatural, while “there were not availability” and “technological instruements” are inaccurate. Repetition of “stress” and “people” also limits variety. Aim to use more precise topic language and check spelling carefully. For example, describe technology as “plays a central role” and refer to “the demands of daily life” rather than repeating general terms such as “pressure.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a contrast clause beginning “while others…” and a reason clause introduced by “because.” However, control is inconsistent, and errors in sentence structure, verb forms, agreement, and articles occur frequently enough to make some sentences difficult to follow. Examples include “I this essay” and “I will elaborate … and present evidence in support of stand,” where the sentence is incomplete or missing necessary grammatical elements. In “it encourage people” and “modern individuals has,” subject–verb agreement is incorrect; “do not prefer to taking part” also has an incorrect verb pattern. Practise building accurate sentences first, then add subordinate clauses, checking agreement and verb patterns during revision.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.