Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below gives information about the five small companies in Britain that came top in a survey of staff conducted by a national newspaper to find out which companies are the best to work for.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

THE FIVE BEST SMALL COMPANIES TO WORK FOR

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The table illustrates the discription about various small companies in Britain that came top in a survey of staff conducted by national newspaper to find out which companies getting best feedback.

The table shows different positions of staff regarding their age and male female ratio and income also.Overall, it was clear that the total staff in 5th position were 190 staff member.Male to female ratio with 74:26 stood at 3rd position.

First and foremost, staff members record the highest share in 5th position with 190 and it same for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th position but least in 1st poition with 56 staff members.Male to female ratio represent highest in 3rd position with 74:26 and 2nd highest in 51:49 in 5th position and 4th position trailed behind 1st and 2nd position.Most of the members are under 35 with maximum 8% over 55, while 33% staff turnover present in 5th position and remaining present in rest of the position.In 3rd position 74% staff in high income bracket, whereas 2nd highest income paid by 2nd position while the third highest by 1st poistion and 4th and 5th position trailed behind that.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You identify several relevant features, including the largest workforce in fifth place, the highest male share in third place, and the leading high-income figure there. However, the overview is limited and does not clearly summarise the main contrasts across the table. Some comparisons are inaccurate or unclear: 190 is not similar to the staff totals in second, third and fourth place, and the statement that the “maximum 8%” are over 55 overlooks that most companies report 0% or 1%. The turnover figures are also not reported accurately as a group. To improve, give a concise overview of the strongest patterns, then select and compare key figures precisely, including the very different age profiles and turnover rates.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

The response has an identifiable structure, moving from an introduction and overview to a paragraph of details, and phrases such as “Overall” and “whereas” help signal relationships. However, progression within the body is difficult to follow because several different categories are combined in long sentences. For example, the sentence beginning “First and foremost” moves from staff numbers to gender ratios, age, turnover and income without clear separation. Some linking expressions are also used imprecisely, such as “it same for” and “remaining present in rest of the position.” Organise the details into clearer groups, such as workforce and demographics followed by turnover and income, and use accurate references to each ranking.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “staff turnover,” “high income bracket,” “ratio,” and “share,” which helps communicate the table’s subject. There is also an attempt to vary phrasing with expressions such as “trailing behind” and “highest share.” However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or repetitive: “getting best feedback” does not clearly describe the survey’s purpose, and “income paid by 2nd position” is not a natural way to report the proportion of staff in a bracket. Spelling errors such as “discription,” “poition,” and “poistion” are noticeable. Use precise reporting language, for example “ranked first,” “accounted for,” and “the proportion of employees,” and check spelling carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences with comparisons, including “In 3rd position 74% staff in high income bracket, whereas…” This shows some effort to connect information, but the range is limited and longer structures are often faulty. Examples include “it same for 2nd,” which lacks a verb, and “Most of the members are under 35 with maximum 8% over 55,” where the relationship between the figures is not expressed clearly. Articles, plurals and sentence boundaries are also inconsistent, as in “190 staff member” and “also.Overall.” Build accurate basic sentences first, using forms such as “The company ranked third had 72 employees” and “Only 8% were over 55,” then combine them with controlled comparison clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.