Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-07-31

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below gives information about the five small companies in Britain that came top in a survey of staff conducted by a national newspaper to find out which companies are the best to work for.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

THE FIVE BEST SMALL COMPANIES TO WORK FOR

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In this table it is compares that five small companies in Britain having top positions in survey of staff presented by an national newspaper and compares about those companies are suitable for work.

Firstly,1st position company having staff members 56 and their male and female ratio is 30:70 and under 35s and over 55s percentage are 77% and 0% and that's good for company progress. Company turnover 5% and the staff members that are in rising income members 34%

Secondly,2nd position company staff members are more that 1st position company and also that male female ratio is high and that is 47:53.

On the other hand, if we compare all the companies staff members in high income bracket then position 3rd company have high income bracket and that is 74%.Whereas, 1st position company have 34% and 2nd position company have 48% and that's the rare case.

In Conclusion,1st three companies are the best companies to work for.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses the task by identifying some main features, such as staff numbers and income brackets. However, the analysis is incomplete and lacks a systematic approach to comparing the five companies. The report focuses heavily on the first two companies while neglecting the others, failing to provide a comprehensive overview of the data provided in the table. The conclusion is also quite brief and does not effectively synthesize the information. To improve, ensure that all key data points are represented and that comparisons are made across all categories for all five companies, rather than focusing on isolated details.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The response uses basic cohesive devices like 'Firstly', 'Secondly', and 'On the other hand' to structure the text. However, the progression of ideas is somewhat disjointed, and the paragraphing is not effectively utilized to separate different aspects of the data. The referencing is occasionally unclear, making it difficult for the reader to follow the comparison between the companies. To improve, focus on grouping related information into distinct paragraphs and using a wider variety of linking words to create a smoother flow between sentences and ideas.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is limited and repetitive, often relying on the language provided in the prompt. Phrases like 'staff members' and 'best companies to work for' are used repeatedly. There are also issues with word choice and collocation, such as 'rising income members' and 'that's the rare case', which hinder precision. To reach a higher band, you should aim to use a wider range of vocabulary to describe trends and comparisons, such as 'proportion', 'percentage', 'fluctuate', or 'significant', and ensure that these terms are used accurately in context.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The response relies heavily on simple sentence structures. There are frequent grammatical errors, including issues with subject-verb agreement ('it is compares', 'company staff members are more that 1st position'), article usage ('an national newspaper'), and awkward phrasing. These errors occasionally make the meaning difficult to grasp. To improve, practice using a mix of complex sentence structures and focus on correcting basic grammatical errors such as verb tense consistency and the correct use of prepositions and articles. Proofreading for these common mistakes will significantly improve the clarity of your writing.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.