Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-13

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below gives information about the five small companies in Britain that came top in a survey of staff conducted by a national newspaper to find out which companies are the best to work for.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

THE FIVE BEST SMALL COMPANIES TO WORK FOR

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The table below shows information related to the five small companies in Britain that came top in a survey of employ held by a national newsaper to check out which companies are the best to work for.

There are five positions in table started with staff numbers and last one is staff in high income bracket. The 5th company have highest staff number for work force that is 190 as compared to 1st company has 56 staff number.

The female ratio is dominant in 4th company as well as in 1st company . The age profile shows companies have high percentage of young workers. The 5th company has the highest porportion of under-35s at 93% followed by 3rd at 82% .Only the 2nd and 4th had over 55s that is 1and 8%.

Finally the staff trunover and pay are inversley related to each other . The 1st company have lowest trunover 5% while the 5th company have highest staff trunover 33%. Similaryly, the 3rd company had highest income bracket 74% while 5th high income figure 2% and 5% in 3rd and 4th companu.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You identify several relevant comparisons, including the largest workforce (190 in fifth place), the high proportion of younger staff in the fifth and third companies, and the turnover extremes. However, the response only partially summarises the table: it gives no clear overall overview of the main patterns, and some important comparisons are omitted. There is also a factual error in the final sentence: the highest high-income figure is 74% for the third company, but the response then says “5% in 3rd and 4th company”; 5% belongs to the fourth company. The claim that turnover and pay are inversely related is too broad, since the figures do not show a consistent relationship across all five companies. Select the main contrasts more accurately and explain them clearly.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a basic sequence: it introduces the table, discusses workforce size and gender, then age, and finally turnover and income. This gives the reader some organisation, and words such as “Finally” and “Similarly” attempt to connect points. However, the progression is not consistently clear: “There are five positions in table started with staff numbers” does not explain the structure effectively, and the final comparison combines turnover and income in a confusing way. Several ideas are crowded into single paragraphs, while full stops and spacing are inconsistent. Use a clear overview followed by logically grouped comparisons, and make each linking phrase express the relationship between the figures accurately.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant task vocabulary, including “staff numbers,” “age profile,” “under-35s,” “staff turnover,” and “high income bracket,” so the topic is generally understandable. However, the range is limited and several word-choice, collocation, and spelling problems reduce precision: “survey of employ,” “dominant,” “porportion,” and “trunover” are examples. “The female ratio is dominant” is also an unnatural way to describe a higher proportion of women. Some expressions, such as “inversely related,” sound analytical but are not supported by the data. Aim for accurate terms such as “female employees accounted for” and “the proportion of staff in the high-income bracket,” and check spelling carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response communicates its main points through mostly simple sentence patterns, with a few attempts to combine comparisons. However, grammatical errors occur frequently and sometimes make relationships between figures unclear. For example, “The 5th company have highest staff number” has errors in subject–verb agreement and article use, while “the 1st company has 56 staff number” uses an awkward singular construction. The sentence beginning “The 5th company has the highest…” also needs clearer punctuation around the following comparison. There is little variety in sentence structure, and the longer final sentence is difficult to follow. Practise accurate comparative sentences, for example, “The fifth-placed company employed 190 people, compared with 56 at the top-ranked company.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.