Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-24

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below gives information about the five small companies in Britain that came top in a survey of staff conducted by a national newspaper to find out which companies are the best to work for.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

THE FIVE BEST SMALL COMPANIES TO WORK FOR

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The table illustrated data of five best small companies to work for in Britain. Companies selected through survey of staff conducted by a national newspaper.

Overall, survey represented numbers of staff in five companies. Moreover, fifth companies has largest number of staff while, first has lower than rest. However, three companies has staff under 35s and 2 companies had more female worker than other.

First company consiste 56 numbers of staff alongwith male:female ratio which was 30:70. Furthermore, first company has 5% stuff turnover while second company has more than 3 time of it which is 18%. Although second company number of staff is 79 with 47:53 ratio of male:female and 1% are over 55s while 59% are under 35s.

The third company has highest ratio of male as compare to female that was 74:26 in 72 staff members, However, both third and fift company has 0% in over 55s. Moreover, fift company has 190 stuff number which was highest in all five companies. Male:female ration in fift company was 51:49 with 335 of stuff turnover. On the other hand fourth company contain 76 number of stuff in total with highest ratio of female 13:87. Staff in high income bracket in first, second, third, fourth and fift was 34%, 48%, 74%, 5% and 2%, respectively.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify the table’s subject and include several relevant comparisons, such as the largest workforce at the fifth-ranked company and the high female share at the fourth. You also report the income-bracket figures for all five companies. However, the overview is unclear and includes an inaccurate generalisation: it says three companies have staff under 35, although all five have some, and the claim that two companies have more female workers is not a useful summary of the overall pattern. Some key figures are omitted, while “335” for the fifth company’s turnover appears to misreport 33%. To strengthen the response, give a precise overview of the main contrasts and check every figure against the table.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a basic paragraph structure: an introduction and overview are followed by details about the companies. This gives the reader some organisation, and comparisons such as the first company’s 5% turnover against the second’s 18% are relevant. However, the progression is not consistently clear: the final paragraph moves between the third, fifth and fourth companies, and the overview’s points are not developed in a clear order. Linking words such as “Moreover,” “However” and “Although” are frequent, but some do not express the relationship accurately. Grouping the companies by a clear feature—for example, workforce and age, then turnover and income—and using fewer, more precise transitions would improve cohesion.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “male:female ratio,” “staff turnover” and “high income bracket,” which helps communicate the table’s categories. However, the range is limited and several word choices or spellings make the description less clear, including “stuff” for staff, “consiste” and “fift.” Phrases such as “highest ratio of male as compare to female” are awkward, and “335 of stuff turnover” is not an accurate or natural way to report the percentage. Aim for standard collocations such as “the proportion of female employees” and “staff turnover stood at 33%.” Proofreading spelling and choosing precise terms for people and percentages will make the information easier to follow.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a contrast with “Although” and a comparison introduced by “while.” However, errors occur frequently and sometimes make relationships difficult to interpret. Subject–verb agreement is inconsistent in “fifth companies has” and “three companies has,” while articles and sentence structure are missing or faulty in “Companies selected through survey” and “first company consiste 56 numbers of staff.” Punctuation also disrupts some sentences, as in “while, first has lower than rest” and the capitalised “However” after a comma. Practise accurate sentence patterns such as “The fifth company has the largest workforce” and “The second company employs 79 people, of whom 59% are under 35.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.