Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-24

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below gives information about the five small companies in Britain that came top in a survey of staff conducted by a national newspaper to find out which companies are the best to work for.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

THE FIVE BEST SMALL COMPANIES TO WORK FOR

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The table shows detail about five small factories in Britian, by national newspaper these companies rank top in staff conducting. If we look at the table the fifth one is a huge staff in almost every group while the first one is lower staff.

The staff numbers of second, third and forth are almost the same but the forth one have the lower ratio of male and female and under 35s/ over 55s while the third one have staff turnover issue which is just 8 percent.

If we talk about the staff whose have high income bracket the third one have the highest of all followed by the second company which is just 48 percent. in conclusion I think the fifth company have the best in these five ones.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

The response identifies a few relevant comparisons, including the third company’s high-income share and the similar staff numbers of the second, third and fourth companies. However, it does not provide a clear, accurate overview of the table’s main patterns. The claim that the fifth company has the largest staff “in almost every group” is unsupported: it has the most employees, but not the highest proportions in most categories. The conclusion that it is the best company also confuses the survey ranking with the writer’s opinion. Several figures and comparisons are omitted, and “staff turnover issue” misrepresents the third company’s relatively low 8% turnover. The response is also 21 words below the required minimum. Include a concise overview and select accurate comparisons across the categories.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a basic paragraph structure and uses simple signposting such as “If we look at the table,” “If we talk about,” and “in conclusion.” These phrases show an attempt to guide the reader through the information. However, there is no clear overall progression from an overview to organised comparisons, and the final opinion does not follow logically from the data. The second paragraph combines several unrelated comparisons, while the third focuses only on income and then jumps to a conclusion. Some linking expressions are repetitive or awkward. Group the information by meaningful patterns—for example, workforce size and age, then turnover and income—and use clear references to the ranked companies.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The response uses a small set of relevant terms, including “staff numbers,” “male and female,” “staff turnover,” and “high income bracket,” so the reader can recognise the broad subject. However, vocabulary is limited and several choices are inaccurate or unnatural, which sometimes makes the intended comparison unclear. “Factories” is not supported by the table, “staff conducting” does not express the survey’s purpose, and “a huge staff” is an awkward way to describe the largest workforce. “The best in these five ones” is also imprecise because the table already gives the survey positions. Use more precise reporting language such as “ranked,” “workforce,” “proportion,” and “recorded,” and check spelling, including “Britain.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response attempts both simple and longer sentence forms, using structures such as “while” and “which,” and its main points are generally understandable. However, errors in agreement, articles, and sentence construction occur frequently. For example, “the forth one have” should use a singular verb, and “the third one have staff turnover issue” has both agreement and article problems. The opening sentence, “The table shows detail about five small factories in Britian, by national newspaper these companies rank top in staff conducting,” is difficult to follow because its clauses are not connected correctly. Capitalisation after the full stop in “in conclusion” is also needed. Practise accurate subject–verb agreement and build clear sentences around one comparison at a time.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.