Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-29

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below gives information about the five small companies in Britain that came top in a survey of staff conducted by a national newspaper to find out which companies are the best to work for.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

THE FIVE BEST SMALL COMPANIES TO WORK FOR

Student answer (Band 4.5)

The table providde information about the five small compnies which are top in a survey os staff conducted by a national newspaper to find out which comapnies are the best work for in britain.

Overall, people age under the 35 or above ages people first number of the survry of staff. staff number the second highest in all companies, while, staff turnover and staff high income brackets occurred least in all companies.

To begin with, First staff consumer started at 56 member found newspaper in 1 company. male-female ratio accounted 30:70. Follwed by, staff in high income brackets stood approximetly around 34%. Moreover, youngst and older people peck highest point around 77%/0% in same company, while staff turn over only started at 5%.

4Th and %th comapnies started at 76 while in fifth 190 staff numbers, while staff income hit a least in same company proportion of 5% and 2%. However, second and third companies very fluctuates in all categories.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You identify the table’s subject and include some relevant figures, such as the first-ranked company’s 56 employees, 30:70 male-to-female ratio, 77% under 35, and 5% turnover. However, the overview is unclear and partly inaccurate: the first company does not have the highest staff number, and turnover and high-income shares are not lowest across all companies. The comparison that the second and third companies “very fluctuates” does not report a clear feature. Several important contrasts are missed, including the fifth company’s largest workforce and highest turnover, and the third company’s highest high-income share. Select a few accurate overall patterns, then compare the companies with precise supporting figures.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

There is an attempt to organise the response into an opening, an overview and detail paragraphs, and sequencing phrases such as “To begin with” and “Moreover” show an effort to guide the reader. However, progression is difficult to follow because the overview makes unclear claims and the details jump between companies and categories. For example, “4Th and %th comapnies” is not a clear reference, while “second and third companies very fluctuates in all categories” does not explain the comparison. Linking expressions are sometimes used mechanically rather than to show a precise relationship. Group the information by meaningful comparisons—for example, workforce and age, then turnover and income—and use clear references to each ranking.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The response uses some task-related vocabulary, including “staff turnover,” “male-female ratio,” and “high income brackets,” so the topic is recognisable. However, the range is basic and several inaccurate or misspelled expressions make the meaning harder to understand: “staff consumer” appears to mean staff numbers, “peck highest point” is unclear, and “companies very fluctuates” is not an appropriate description. Spelling errors such as “providde,” “comapnies,” and “approximetly” are also frequent. Aim for accurate, conventional table language rather than unusual phrases: describe figures as “stood at,” “accounted for,” or “was the highest/lowest,” and check spelling and word forms carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

You attempt both simple and longer sentence forms, and the response has recognisable sentence boundaries. However, grammatical errors are frequent and sometimes obscure relationships between the data. Examples include “people age under the 35 or above ages people first number,” which lacks a clear grammatical structure, and “second and third companies very fluctuates,” which has problems with the verb and sentence construction. Articles, plurals and prepositions are also often missing or inaccurate, as in “in 1 company” and “in fifth 190 staff numbers.” Build clear subject–verb sentences, such as “The first-ranked company employed 56 people,” and check agreement, articles and punctuation. More accurate simple sentences would make the comparisons easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.