Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-11-02
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The table below gives information about the five small companies in Britain that came top in a survey of staff conducted by a national newspaper to find out which companies are the best to work for.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
THE FIVE BEST SMALL COMPANIES TO WORK FOR
Student answer (Band 5.0)
The table illustrates the information about five small Britain companies that is listed on survey of staff conducting by newspaper to find which companies are doing best for work.
Overall, percentage of staff numbers of 5th company is much more higher as compared to others. The age and gender requirements of staff is nearly same but the turnover of 5th company that is about 33% is higher than others.
Primarly, i would talk about staff numbers in 1st company that is 56 but the higher numbers of staff that are employed in 5th company is 190. Secondly, the ratio of male or female is same in numbers but it varies with different companies.All companies required the under 35 age group.
The minimum staff turnover is 5% but in contrast the utmost turnover is 33% that is extremely good.Furthermore, i am talking about staff in high income bracket that is magnificient in 3rd company because this company have neither too little nor too much numbers of staff.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
You identify the table’s subject and include a brief overview, noting that the fifth-ranked company has the most employees and the highest turnover. You also mention the smallest workforce and the third company’s high-income figure. However, the overview is partly inaccurate: age and gender patterns are not “nearly same,” and the fifth company’s turnover is not “extremely good” but simply the highest. Several comparisons are vague or unsupported, such as saying all companies “required” under-35 staff, and the high-income comparison does not explain that the third company leads at 74%, while the fourth and fifth are much lower. Select key contrasts and report them accurately and objectively.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0
The response has a basic structure, moving from an introduction and overview to details, and signposts such as “Overall,” “Secondly,” and “Furthermore” show an attempt to guide the reader. However, progression is limited: the body shifts between staff numbers, gender, age, turnover and income without developing clear comparisons, and some linking phrases do not express the relationship accurately. For example, “but in contrast” introduces the turnover extremes, while “Furthermore” leads to a separate income point. The final sentence is difficult to follow because it links the third company’s income result to its staff numbers without explaining the connection. Group related figures and use clearer comparisons to improve flow.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use some task-related vocabulary, including “staff turnover,” “ratio,” and “high income bracket,” so the reader can recognise the main topics. There are also attempts at more formal wording, such as “utmost” and “magnificient,” but several choices are inaccurate or unnatural and sometimes obscure the intended meaning. “Requirements” does not describe the age profile, and “extremely good” is an inappropriate evaluation of a turnover figure. Phrases such as “percentage of staff numbers” and “doing best for work” are also imprecise. Aim for standard chart language and accurate collocations; this will make your comparisons clearer without requiring more elaborate vocabulary.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and longer sentences, including a contrast with “but” and a sentence beginning “Furthermore.” However, control is inconsistent, and errors in sentence structure and agreement frequently make the meaning less clear. For example, “five small Britain companies” and “that is listed on survey” have faulty noun and verb patterns, while “this company have” does not agree in number. The sentence “the ratio of male or female is same in numbers” is also structurally unclear. Punctuation is sometimes missing after sentence boundaries, as in “companies.All.” Practise accurate basic sentence patterns first, then add complex clauses with correct agreement and punctuation.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
