Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-07-29

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

1968 and 2018: average weekly spending by families

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The chart illustrates the information about How members of faimly in one nation spent their 7 days income in 1968 and in 2018.

Overall,it is crystal clear that individuals of 1968 and 2018 spent their most of expenditure on food ,whereas in both centuries citizens spent their least amount of money on fuel and power.

Looking at the information,Food was most spending product consume by faimlies in year 1980 and in 2018(35%17%).however individuals of faimly spent minimum income on leisure in 1980,it was become most spending product in 2018(23%).in year 1980 faimlies spent their similar income on housing as same as clothing and footwear(10%),whereas housing experience upward in 2018(19%) and clothing and footwear feels downward in choice of faimlies in next century.

Moving further,faimlies in 1980 and in 2018 spent their least amount of income oh fuel and power(6%and 4%).faimlies in 1980 spent their similar amount of income on houseshold goods,personal goods,and transport in tear 1980(7%)respectively.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response covers the main features of the chart, including the shift in spending patterns between 1968 and 2018. However, there are significant factual errors in the data reporting. You incorrectly identified the years as 1980 instead of 1968, and the percentages provided (e.g., 35% and 17% for food) do not accurately reflect the data provided in the prompt. While you attempted to make comparisons, the inaccuracies in data transcription hinder the overall task achievement. To improve, ensure you carefully transcribe figures from the chart and double-check the years mentioned in the prompt.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into paragraphs, and there is a basic attempt at logical progression. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate, such as the awkward transition 'Moving further' and the repetitive use of 'in year 1980'. The referencing is sometimes unclear, and the flow between sentences is occasionally disjointed. To reach a higher band, focus on using a wider variety of linking words (e.g., 'in contrast', 'subsequently', 'meanwhile') and ensure that your paragraphing clearly separates the overview from the detailed data analysis.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is somewhat limited and repetitive. You rely on basic terms like 'spending product' and 'amount of income'. There are also several spelling errors, such as 'faimly' and 'houseshold', and word choice issues like 'experience upward' instead of 'experienced an increase'. While the meaning is generally conveyed, the lack of precision and the frequent spelling mistakes limit the score. Expanding your range of vocabulary related to trends and data description would be highly beneficial.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The response contains a mix of simple and some attempted complex structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors throughout. Issues include incorrect verb tenses ('it was become'), missing articles, and subject-verb agreement errors ('faimlies... spent their similar income'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, with missing spaces after commas and periods. While these errors do not completely impede communication, they are frequent enough to lower the score. Focusing on basic sentence construction and proofreading for subject-verb agreement would significantly improve your accuracy.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.