Band 4.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-09-27

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

1968 and 2018: average weekly spending by families

Student answer (Band 4.0)

The bar chart illustre about how families in one country spent their weekly income in between 1968 to 2018 .

Overall, it can see that clearly , this familie highly spend there income very impordant two category food and housing .While there lowest income spend last two year fuel and power , and personal goods. And most notice able point household goods are smae the last two year they spend weekly income .

There weekly income invest approximetly 35 percent food but it percentage decreasing around 17.5 percent in 1968 to 2018 .And second most demandable sector spend income housing there spend increasing income 10 percent to around 19 percent . While transport and leisure are increasing around 14 percent and probably 22 percent frome 1968 to 2018 .

In 1968 to 2018 between there weekly income lowest spend fuel and power , and personsl goods . Ther fule and power around 6 percent in 1968 but 2018 it some decreace motly 4 percent . While there personal doods smae way decreace between 1968 to 2018 .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

The student attempts to address the task by reporting several main features and comparisons from the chart, such as the drop in food spending and the rise in housing, leisure, and transport. However, the response suffers from significant inaccuracies in reporting data (e.g., claiming food started at 35 percent in 1968 but also stating it decreased around 17.5 percent from 1968 to 2018, which is confusingly phrased). Furthermore, the overview is extremely weak and poorly articulated, failing to clearly outline the overarching trends such as the shift from essential spending to leisure and housing. While some key information is touched upon, the overall development and selection of data are hampered by severe expression issues. This places the response firmly at Band 4.0 for Task Achievement.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.0

The essay is divided into short paragraphs, but the logical progression within and between them is frequently disrupted by broken syntax and unclear referencing. Phrases like 'Overall, it can see that clearly , this familie highly spend there income...' demonstrate a lack of cohesive control and mechanical referencing. Logical connectors are either missing or misused, such as inappropriate transitions ('While there lowest income spend last two year...'). Although the text is roughly grouped by topic into paragraphs, the internal cohesion is faulty throughout, resulting in a score of 4.0 for Coherence and Cohesion.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.0

The lexical resource is very basic and heavily flawed. There are numerous severe spelling mistakes and word-choice errors, such as 'illustre' instead of illustrates, 'familie' instead of families, 'impordant' instead of important, 'notice able' instead of noticeable, 'smae' instead of same, and 'approximetly' instead of approximately. The student attempts some topic-related vocabulary such as 'weekly income', 'category', and 'sector', but the persistent errors in basic spelling and word formation severely strain the reader and impede comprehension at times. This performance aligns with Band 4.0.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.0

Grammatical control is extremely weak throughout the text. The response lacks error-free sentences, containing frequent and severe errors in word order, verb forms, sentence structure, and prepositions. Examples include 'it can see that clearly', 'this familie highly spend there income very impordant two category', and 'There weekly income invest approximetly 35 percent food'. Complex sentence structures are generally absent or attempted with total failure of syntactic rules. Punctuation is also erratic with spaces placed incorrectly before commas. This level of grammatical accuracy and range corresponds to a Band 4.0.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.