Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-09

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

1968 and 2018: average weekly spending by families

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The bar graph displays information about how famalies in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and 2018. The majority part of income was spent on food in 1968.

It is clear that maximum part of income was spent on food items in 1968 which records 35% of weekly income and in 2018 it reduced to 17%. 10% of weekly income was used in housing 1968 which has increased upto 19% in 2018. Expenditure on fuel and power was nearly 6% in 1968 but it reduced to 4% in 2018. expences on footware and clothing were 10% in 1968 which declined to 5% in 2018.

Moreover, almost 8% of income was utilised on household goods in 1968 and it remain constant till 2018. Expences on personal goods was nearly 8% in 1968 and it reduced to 4% in 2018. Expenditure on transportation was about 8% in 1968 and it increased to 14% in 2018. Almost 9% of weekly income was spent leisure which has hiked upto 22% in 2018.

To conclude, expences on housing, transportation and liesure has been increased compared to previous where as all other expences are decreased or remain consistent.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

You cover all eight spending categories and report the main changes accurately: food falls from 35% to 17%, while housing and leisure rise to 19% and 22%, respectively. Your concluding comparison also identifies the categories that increased and those that fell or stayed stable. This gives the response a clear overview supported by relevant figures. To strengthen it further, make the overview more explicit near the beginning: for example, note that food was the largest item in 1968, whereas leisure became the largest in 2018. The opening only highlights food in 1968, so the key shift between the two years is not fully foregrounded, although the later details and conclusion do convey it.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a coherent overall arrangement: an introduction, a sequence of comparisons, and a concluding summary. Grouping several categories in the middle paragraph and using transitions such as “Moreover” and “To conclude” helps readers follow the report. However, the progression is somewhat list-like, with each category presented in turn rather than with stronger grouping of related increases, decreases, and stable figures. Some linking is also mechanical, and the final sentence’s “compared to previous” does not clearly identify the comparison point. Organise the body around the main patterns—for example, rising categories first, then falling or unchanged ones—and use clearer references to make the relationships between figures more explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a reasonable range of task-related vocabulary, including “expenditure,” “declined,” “increased,” and “remain constant,” so the main trends are generally understandable. However, several spelling and word-choice problems reduce precision: “famalies,” “expences,” “footware,” and “liesure” are misspelled, while “hiked” is too informal for an academic report. Some phrases are also awkward, such as “maximum part of income” and “spent leisure.” Repeated use of “income was spent” limits flexibility. Aim for accurate, natural collocations such as “the proportion allocated to” or “spending on leisure,” and check spelling carefully. These improvements would make the vocabulary more controlled and appropriate to the formal chart-report style.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You communicate the comparisons using a mix of simple statements and some longer structures, including “which has increased” and “which declined.” Most figures and their directions remain understandable. However, some grammatical errors recur and make the writing less controlled. For example, “10% … was used in housing 1968” is missing a preposition and has an unclear time phrase; “it remain constant” has incorrect subject–verb agreement; and “was spent leisure” needs a grammatical construction such as “was spent on leisure.” The conclusion also has agreement problems in “housing, transportation and liesure has been increased.” Practise accurate past-tense reporting and sentence patterns for describing proportions, while varying structures without allowing clauses to become awkward.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.