Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-15

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

1968 and 2018: average weekly spending by families

Student answer (Band 4.5)

The graf below illustrates the informatio about the family how they spent their weekly salary from 1968 to 2018.

After analysising the chart it could be clearly seen that the family consumed most of the income on food in the year 2018 in compare to 1968. Furthermore, in 2018, they spent less money on housing which is ten percent. in 1968, they used to spend more money on housing which was nearly 20 percent. On fuel and power in the year 1968, there spenting average was below 5 and that was surged gradually in the later years. if we look at the household goods they consumed money at the same level as they used to consumed in 1968 that was aproximately 8 percent. in 1968, they spent money on leisure over 20 that was decreased dramatically in 2018.

Overall, In 2018, they highest amount was on food and lowest was on fuel and power. In 1968, the maximum consumption was on leisure whereas the lowest was onpersonal goods.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 3.5

The response identifies some relevant categories and attempts an overall summary, but it does not accurately report the chart’s main features. Several comparisons are reversed: food was the largest category in 1968, not 2018; housing rose from about 10% to 19%, rather than falling; and leisure increased from about 9% to 22%, rather than declining. The statement that fuel and power rose is also incorrect, as it fell from roughly 6% to 4%. The overview additionally misidentifies the largest category in 1968. These substantial inaccuracies and limited accurate selection mean the task is only minimally addressed. To improve, check each figure against the chart and summarise the major increases and decreases accurately.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

There is some organisation: the response begins with an introduction, moves through several categories, and ends with an overall statement. Basic linking expressions such as “Furthermore,” “if we look at,” and “Overall” help signal movement between points. However, the discussion does not progress clearly from the most important features to supporting comparisons, and the category-by-category sequence is difficult to follow because several statements are unclear or contradictory. The overview comes at the end and repeats or misstates details rather than bringing the main trends together. Use separate paragraphs for an accurate overview and grouped comparisons, and connect related changes—for example, categories that increased versus those that decreased.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The response uses some task-related vocabulary, including “weekly salary,” “housing,” “fuel and power,” and “household goods,” so the reader can recognise the subject. However, the range is limited and several choices or forms are inaccurate, making parts difficult to interpret: “the family consumed most of the income,” “there spending average,” and “maximum consumption” are not natural ways to describe household expenditure. There are also spelling errors such as “graf,” “informatio,” and “aproximately.” Prefer precise chart language such as “families spent,” “accounted for,” and “the proportion allocated to.” Check spelling and use consistent terms for spending categories.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response attempts both simple and longer sentences, including clauses introduced by “Furthermore” and “if we look at,” but control is uneven. Errors in verb forms and sentence construction occur frequently, as in “After analysising the chart,” “there spenting average was,” and “they used to consumed.” Agreement and article use are also problematic in “the family consumed most of the income,” while sentence boundaries and capitalisation are inconsistent, for example “in 1968” after a full stop and “if” beginning a sentence in lowercase. These errors sometimes make the intended comparison hard to understand. Practise accurate past-tense reporting and build shorter, complete sentences before adding subordinate clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.