Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-17

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

1968 and 2018: average weekly spending by families

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The bar chart below provides knowladge about average families in one country spent their weekly income between 1968 and 2018

Overall, the chart changed a lot in 50 years. Food stands top comparing to the other segment in 1968, the families spent 35% from their weely income on it. The only same thing is abot fuel and power. It accounted the lowes percentages both in 1968 and 2018 at 6% and 4% only. Household good remain same at 8% from 1968 to 2018

In 2018, the mejor increment accounted from their weekly income on leisure, around 22%. where they was spended only 9% at 1968, repectively. Spent their income on food is allmost half at 17% at 2018.

Personal goods shown a decrement and the lowes percentage at 2018, around 4%, which was doubled aroud at 8% in 1968. Clothing and footware also provides the same charecteristics reduced half betweed 50 years.

In conclution, spending on leisure has been incrsed rapild

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion5.0
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy4.5
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify several important features accurately: food was the largest category in 1968 at 35%, leisure rose from 9% to about 22%, and household goods stayed at 8%. You also note the fall in food spending to 17% and the decline in clothing and footwear. However, the overview is incomplete and some claims are inaccurate or unclear. Fuel and power was not the only category that stayed the same: household goods also remained unchanged. It was the smallest category in 2018, but not in 1968, when it was 6% and personal goods was 8%. The response also omits the substantial rise in housing and transport. A clearer overview and more balanced selection of comparisons would make the report more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a basic structure, with an opening, an overview, two detail paragraphs and a concluding sentence. This gives the reader some organisation, and comparisons such as leisure rising from 9% to 22% are placed together. However, progression is uneven: the overview mixes several details, while the final conclusion repeats only the rise in leisure rather than summarising the main pattern. Some links are unclear or mechanically used, including “respectively” and the sentence beginning “where they was spended.” Grouping increases, decreases and stable categories more systematically would improve the flow. Use clear linking phrases to show contrasts, and ensure each sentence connects logically to the one before it.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant chart vocabulary, including “accounted,” “percentages,” “decrement” and “reduced,” and the reader can generally identify the categories being discussed. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, such as “provides knowledge,” “the only same thing,” and “the major increment accounted from.” Spelling errors are also frequent, including “knowladg,” “weely,” “lowes,” “repectively” and “conclution,” which distract from the report. Aim for precise, natural expressions for describing data, such as “accounted for,” “remained unchanged,” “rose” and “fell.” Check spelling carefully, especially for category names and common reporting vocabulary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

You attempt both simple and more extended sentences, but control is inconsistent, and several sentence patterns are incomplete or faulty. For example, “It accounted the lowes percentages” is missing the required preposition, while “where they was spended only 9%” has problems with clause structure, agreement and passive form. “Household good remain same” also lacks appropriate tense and article use. The final sentence, “In conclution, spending on leisure has been incrsed rapild,” is not grammatically complete as written. Use past-tense forms consistently when reporting the two years, and practise complete sentences with accurate subject–verb agreement and articles. Shorter, well-controlled comparisons would help make the information easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.