Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-22

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

1968 and 2018: average weekly spending by families

Student answer (Band 4.5)

In The bar charts provide key information about families in one country spent their weekly between 1968 and 2018 , the units mesaured percentages .

Overall , it is clear from the bars charts that the families have the most spent on food in 1968 they reach the peak one into 35% , however the same are fall low than tweenty % , next it is housing are grow dramaticly between as years in 10% into approximactly 20% .

According in the what is show its easy to say that fiel and power and clothing and footware personal goods transport stay whit fluctuate percentags the househould had a equal percentags between 1963 and 2018 as the same .

In the terms

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

You identify two important features: food was the largest category in 1968, at about 35%, and housing rose from around 10% to 19%. However, the overview is incomplete and some comparisons are inaccurate or unclear. For example, saying that several categories “stay” with fluctuating percentages does not explain their actual changes: transport rose from 8% to 14%, while fuel and power and personal goods fell. Household goods remained at about 8%, but the text gives the incorrect year “1963.” The response also ends mid-sentence (“In the terms”), leaving the chart only minimally summarised. It is 29 words below the required minimum. To improve, complete the report and select the main rises, falls, and stable category accurately.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.0

There is an attempt to organise the response with an overview beginning “Overall” and a further comparison introduced by “According in the what is show.” These signals show an effort to guide the reader. However, the ideas do not progress clearly: the second paragraph combines several categories without explaining their individual trends, and the final paragraph is unfinished. Connections such as “however” and “next” do not consistently clarify the relationship between the figures, while the long, loosely joined sentences make the comparisons difficult to follow. Use separate paragraphs for the overview and key details, then group categories by whether they rose, fell, or stayed stable. Clear sentence boundaries and more precise linking would make the information easier to track.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The response uses some relevant chart vocabulary, including “percentages,” “peak,” “housing,” and “fluctuate,” and attempts to describe change with “grow dramatically.” However, the range is basic and several word choices or forms make the meaning difficult to understand. Phrases such as “the families have the most spent,” “the same are fall low,” and “stay whit fluctuate percentags” are not natural ways to report data. There are also frequent spelling errors, including “mesaured,” “dramaticly,” and “househould.” Use accurate reporting phrases such as “accounted for,” “increased,” “declined,” and “remained stable,” and check spelling carefully. More precise category-by-category wording would help communicate the comparisons.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

You attempt some longer sentence forms, including a contrast with “however” and a comparison using “between 1968 and 2018.” Nevertheless, grammatical control is weak: errors are frequent and sometimes obscure the intended meaning. For example, “the families have the most spent on food” has an incorrect verb construction, while “the same are fall low than tweenty %” combines incompatible verb forms and an unclear comparison. The opening sentence also lacks a clear grammatical structure, and the final fragment, “In the terms,” is incomplete. Practise forming simple, accurate comparison sentences first—for example, “Food accounted for 35% in 1968, compared with 17% in 2018”—then add more complex structures once the basic clauses are secure.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.