Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-30

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

1968 and 2018: average weekly spending by families

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The diagram compares the proportion of weekly income spent on various items by average households in a single nation in 1968 and 2018, measured in percentage.

Overall, it is visible that in 1968 the percentage of weekly incomes the highest spent on food. While by 2018 the figure of leisure items was considerably largest purchase and housing was becoming second most brought thing. However, spent on fuel and power minimum in both years.

A glance at the chart reveals that by 1968, 35% purchase in food by public, which was significant decreased approximately to 18% in 2018, make leisure item the most buying tings at 23%. while in 1968 the percentage of leisure , personal goods, household goods items and transport all ware same at around 9%, fuel power show tiny brought at roughly 6%.

Further more analysis the bar chart describe that the proportion of money spent on clothing and footware fall significant from at 10% in 1968 to 5% in 2018. whereas, by 2018, reduced slightly in fuel power and personal goods items purchases. In contrast by 2018, rose dramatically in transport and housing to approximately 14% and 18% respectively.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You identify the main contrast accurately: food was the largest category in 1968, while leisure became the largest in 2018, and fuel and power remained among the smallest. You also report several useful figures, including food at 35% and its fall to about 18%, and the rises in housing and transport. This covers the task and shows some selection of key features. However, the overview is not fully clear, and some comparisons are incomplete: for example, household goods stayed at 8%, a notable unchanged figure, but this is not mentioned. The claim that fuel and power was the minimum in both years is inaccurate, since personal goods was also 4% in 2018. More precise, complete comparisons would strengthen the response.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, an overview and two detail paragraphs, and the information generally moves from the main categories to other changes. This gives the reader an overall route through the chart. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow because several categories are crowded into one sentence, and links such as “while,” “whereas” and “in contrast” are not always used to express a clear relationship. The overview sentence beginning “While by 2018” is also an incomplete construction, which interrupts the flow. Grouping the figures more consistently—for example, decreases together and increases or stable categories together—and using clearer sentence boundaries would make the organisation more effective.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant chart vocabulary, including “proportion,” “percentage,” “decreased,” “rose” and “approximately,” and you attempt to vary how changes are described. However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or unnatural, as in “most brought thing,” “significant decreased,” “tiny brought” and “most buying tings.” These expressions sometimes make the intended meaning harder to understand. There are also spelling errors, including “footware,” “ware” and “tings.” Use standard reporting phrases such as “accounted for,” “fell,” “the largest category” and “spending on.” This would make your vocabulary more precise and appropriate to an academic chart summary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt a mixture of simple and more complex sentences, including comparisons introduced by “while” and “whereas.” However, many sentences contain errors in clause structure and verb forms, which sometimes make the relationships between ideas unclear. For example, “the percentage of weekly incomes the highest spent on food” lacks a clear grammatical structure, and “which was significant decreased” uses an incorrect verb form. The sentence beginning “Further more analysis” is also not formed as a complete, clear clause. Articles, agreement and punctuation are inconsistent as well. Practise building accurate comparison sentences with a clear subject and verb, such as “Spending on food fell from 35% to 17%, whereas leisure rose to 22%.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.