Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-04

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

1968 and 2018: average weekly spending by families

Student answer (Band 6.0)

this chart ilustrates the families weekly income spent on the daily basis in the year of 1968 and 2018 .

overall, the consumption of the utilities have decreased , while for leisure and housing have grew significantly

in 1968 the food expenses were 35% and in 2018 it was reduced to costing only 21% ,fuel and power also fell slightly from 6% in 1968 to 4% ,clothing and footware followed a similair pattern as it expenses decreased from 10% to half of that in 2018 ,household goods remained the same below 10% and personal goods limited their weekly spending from 8% in 1968 to 4% in 2018.

on the hand the weekly income had major growth for the rest oof the catagoeries as the housing maintenance climbed from 10% weekly expenses to to almost double in 2018 , transport also rose from 8% to 14% and the biggest expense from our weekly income from our weekly income became leisure activities as it was just under 10% in 1968 and grew approximatly to 24% .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You identify the main contrast accurately: food spending fell substantially, while housing, transport and leisure took larger shares in 2018. The overview captures this broad shift, and most figures you report match the chart, including food at 35% in 1968, fuel and power at 6% and 4%, and transport at 8% and 14%. However, food in 2018 is about 17%, not 21%, and leisure is about 22%, rather than 24%. The statement that “the rest” of the categories grew is also too broad, since several categories declined and household goods stayed level. To strengthen the response, report the key figures more precisely and distinguish increases, decreases and unchanged spending clearly.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a coherent overall arrangement: an introduction, a brief overview, and two paragraphs contrasting categories that fell or stayed similar with those that rose. This gives the reader a clear general progression. Linking phrases such as “while” and “on the hand” attempt to signal contrast, but the latter is incomplete, and the long final paragraph strings several comparisons together with commas, making relationships between details less clear. Some references, such as “the rest of the categories,” are also vague because not all remaining categories increased. Use shorter, more controlled sentences and clearer transitions, and group the data consistently by trend to make the comparisons easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough topic vocabulary to communicate the main comparisons, including “decreased,” “fell slightly,” “remained the same,” “climbed” and “grew.” There are also attempts at more descriptive language, such as “biggest expense.” However, several choices are inaccurate or unnatural for chart reporting: “consumption of the utilities” does not describe the spending categories, “housing maintenance” is not the chart label, and “weekly income spent on the daily basis” is unclear. Spelling errors such as “ilustrates,” “similair,” “catagoeries” and “approximatly” are noticeable. Prefer the chart’s precise category names and standard collocations such as “accounted for” or “share of weekly expenditure,” and check spelling carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including comparisons with “while” and clauses describing changes over time. The overall meaning is generally recoverable, but grammatical control is uneven, particularly in the longer sentences. For example, “the consumption of the utilities have decreased” has an agreement problem, while “housing and leisure have grew” uses an incorrect verb form. The sentence beginning “on the hand” also lacks the expected article and contains a repeated “to” in “to to almost double.” Punctuation is inconsistent, with several comparisons joined by commas rather than separated into complete sentences. Build accuracy by checking subject–verb agreement and past-tense forms, and divide long lists into shorter sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.