Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-08-08

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graphs below show the number of drivers in Britain who have been caught driving too fast by speed cameras placed on roads, and the number of people killed in road accidents, over an eight-year period since the introduction of speed cameras. The tables show the results of a survey on people's opinions on speed cameras.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

SPEED CAMERA FINES and ROAD ACCIDENT FATALITIES

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The line graph demonstrate the idea of drivers of Britain experienced fines due to the high speeds and the countless people died by drivers throughout the displayed times from speed cameras existing.In addition, the table introducing the perspectives of inhabitants upon speed cameras.

Overall, it is noticeable that in the line graph faced escalating towards speed camera fines and the road accident fluctuated in the periods.Moreover, minor people are do not know anything about this practice.

Firstly, the line graph illustrate the information that at first year, around 200,000 fines issued by speed cameras for Britain people who drive fast.It was gradually increasing until 8 years and the statistics reached at 1,000,000.On the road accident side, 3000 accidents captured at beginning which obtained ups and downs until 7 years and at last remain nearly similar.

Furthermore, it is considered by table chart that around 32% of masses predicted that cameras might be reduced the amount of accidents, whereas, 60% are against it and 8% people are not sure about it.Additionally, it is undoubtedly that according to 71% of people this method utilised for improving the income, however, 26% believed that it helps to enhance road safety and 3% people do not know anything.Apart from this, there are plenty of cameras on road argued by 56% people.In contrast, 19% are in favour with few cameras.Though 17% of communities think that this enhancement at right place, 8% unaware about it.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response covers all parts of the task by describing both the line graph and the survey tables. However, the analysis is somewhat superficial. While you correctly identify the upward trend in fines and the fluctuations in fatalities, the description of the tables is a list of figures rather than a synthesis of the data. To reach a higher band, you should focus on highlighting key features and making meaningful comparisons between the data points, rather than simply listing percentages. The overview is present but lacks a clear summary of the most significant trends, such as the inverse relationship between the rise in cameras and the public's skepticism regarding their purpose.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The response is organized into logical paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. You use some cohesive devices such as 'In addition', 'Firstly', and 'Furthermore'. However, the use of these devices is sometimes mechanical or slightly unnatural, such as 'Apart from this, there are plenty of cameras on road argued by 56% people'. The progression of ideas is generally clear, but the flow between sentences could be improved by using more varied linking phrases and ensuring that referencing is precise. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the graph data from the survey data.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The range of vocabulary is adequate for the task but lacks precision and sophistication. You rely on basic phrasing such as 'minor people' (instead of 'a minority of people') and 'masses' (which is not the most accurate term for survey respondents). There are also some awkward collocations, such as 'the line graph faced escalating' and 'the statistics reached at'. To improve, you should focus on using more academic vocabulary related to data description, such as 'upward trend', 'significant proportion', or 'fluctuated marginally'. Spelling is generally accurate, but word choice often hinders the clarity of your analysis.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The response contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede readability. Examples include 'The line graph demonstrate' (subject-verb agreement), 'minor people are do not know' (incorrect verb construction), and 'cameras might be reduced' (incorrect passive voice). Punctuation is also inconsistent, with missing spaces after periods and commas. While the meaning is generally understandable, the high frequency of errors in basic grammar prevents the response from reaching a higher band. Focusing on subject-verb agreement and consistent verb tenses would significantly improve your score.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.