Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-08-29

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graphs below show the number of drivers in Britain who have been caught driving too fast by speed cameras placed on roads, and the number of people killed in road accidents, over an eight-year period since the introduction of speed cameras. The tables show the results of a survey on people's opinions on speed cameras.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

SPEED CAMERA FINES and ROAD ACCIDENT FATALITIES

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The given line graphs elucidate the information about the number of speedy drivers who had been caught by speed cameras placed on the roads as well as numerous individuals who died as result of rood accidents over eight period since the introduction of cameras. Moreover, the tables show the results from survey conducted on different opinions on the speed cameras.

Overall, the speed fines had been rising steadily from year to years also road accident facilities had been remaining stable over the given period. Moreover, in the survey conducted on people's opinion on speed cameras more people do not think that speed cameras had reduced the number of road accident, other thinks that the main reason for the installation of speed cameras is to improve road safety.

To begin with the speed camera fines had increased steadily from 200, 000 in the first year to 1,600,000 in the 8th year. additionally, Road accident facilities had remained unchanged over the years of 3,000 which decreased about2900 in the forth year and reached its peak of approximately to 3500 in the last year.

Similarly, the survey conducted on people's opinion on speed cameras more people think that speed cameras had reduced the number of road accident who are 60% and 37% says yes. Other thinks that the main reason for the installation of speed cameras is to improve road safety who are 26% while oher 71.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response covers all parts of the task, including the graphs and the survey tables. However, the analysis is inconsistent and contains factual inaccuracies. For instance, you state that road accident fatalities remained 'stable' and 'unchanged' at 3,000, yet you later mention a peak of 3,500 and a decrease to 2,900, which contradicts your initial summary. Furthermore, the interpretation of the survey data is confusing; the percentages provided (60%, 37%, 26%, 71%) are not clearly linked to the specific survey questions, making the information difficult to follow. To improve, ensure that your data points are accurately transcribed and that your summary reflects the actual trends shown in the visuals.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate. For example, 'Similarly' is used to introduce the survey data, but it does not logically connect to the previous paragraph about accident statistics. Additionally, referencing is sometimes unclear, such as in the final sentence where 'other 71' is left hanging without context. The progression of ideas is hindered by these lapses in cohesion and the confusing presentation of the survey results. Using a wider variety of linking words and ensuring clear pronoun referencing would improve the flow.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks precision and contains several errors. You use 'speedy drivers' instead of 'speeding drivers' and 'rood accidents' (a typo for road). There is also confusion between 'facilities' and 'fatalities', which significantly changes the meaning of your report. While you attempt to use some topic-specific vocabulary like 'installation' and 'survey', the frequent word-choice errors and spelling mistakes (e.g., 'forth' instead of 'fourth', 'oher' instead of 'other') limit the effectiveness of your communication. Focusing on accurate terminology for data description is essential.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The response uses a mix of simple and some complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors throughout. Issues include incorrect verb tenses (e.g., 'had been rising' when simple past or present perfect would be more appropriate), missing articles, and punctuation errors, such as the space in '200, 000'. Subject-verb agreement is also inconsistent, as seen in 'other thinks' instead of 'others think'. These errors occur frequently and occasionally cause the reader to pause, though the overall meaning remains generally discernible. Increasing the accuracy of basic sentence construction should be your priority.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.