Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-09-17
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The graphs below show the number of drivers in Britain who have been caught driving too fast by speed cameras placed on roads, and the number of people killed in road accidents, over an eight-year period since the introduction of speed cameras. The tables show the results of a survey on people's opinions on speed cameras.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.
SPEED CAMERA FINES and ROAD ACCIDENT FATALITIES
Student answer (Band 6.0)
The graphs depict the number of drivers who have been caught rash driving and number of people being killed in road accidents in an interval of eight year since the speed cameras were introduced in Britain. Likewise, it incorporates the results of survey conducted on people's opinions on speed cameras.
Overall, the number speed camera fines kept increasing from initial year to the eighth year whereas road accident fatalities has less fluctuation in numbers.
Starting with 200,000 camera fines from first year, numbers slowly increased up between 400,000 to 600,000 till fifth year. However, significant rise was observed between sixth year to eight year reaching the speed camera fines approximately around 1.6 million. Similarly, road accident fatalities remained almost constant between 3,000 to 3,500 with a slight decrement in the fourth year.
From the results obtained from people's opinions on speed cameras survey, it was observed that around 60% civilians think speed cameras doesn't contribute to reduction of road accidents, whereas 32% people said yes and remaining 8% were unaware. Likewise, 71% people believe main reason for the installation of speed cameras is to raise revenue, whereas 23% think its for improvement of road safety and 3% don't have an answer.
Similarly, when asked about quantity of speed cameras on the roads, 56% of the people said too many were present on the road unnecessarily, 19% opposed to too few, and 17% think its about right whereas 8% of the people have no idea about the numbers.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0
The student successfully addresses all parts of the prompt by describing both the trends in the line graphs and the survey data presented in the tables. An overview is provided, highlighting the general upward trend in speed camera fines alongside the relatively stable pattern of road fatalities, and summarizing the survey highlights. Key data points are selected and reported, such as the rise of fines to approximately 1.6 million by year eight and the peak percentages in the survey tables (e.g., 71% believing cameras raise revenue). Although there are minor inaccuracies in reporting the survey data—such as stating '23%' instead of the transcribed '26%' for road safety—the core information is accurately conveyed and well-selected, fulfilling the requirements for a Band 6.5 or 7.0 response.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0
The report exhibits a clear logical progression and a coherent overall arrangement. The response is divided into logical paragraphs: an introduction, an overview, a detailed paragraph for the line graphs, and two paragraphs for the survey tables. Cohesive devices are used to link ideas, such as 'Overall', 'Starting with', 'However', and 'Similarly'. While some of the transitions and referencing are slightly mechanical or repetitive in structure (such as starting multiple sentences with 'Similarly' or 'From the results'), the progression of information remains easy to follow and paragraphing is used appropriately throughout.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
The student demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting less common phrases such as 'road accident fatalities', 'significant rise', and 'remain almost constant'. However, there are some noticeable inaccuracies in word choice, collocation, and phrasing, such as 'caught rash driving' instead of 'speeding', 'has less fluctuation' instead of 'exhibited fewer fluctuations', and 'decrement' instead of 'decrease' or 'reduction'. Furthermore, minor omissions or awkward phrasings appear, such as 'the speed camera fines approximately around 1.6 million'. These lexical errors do not impede communication, placing the response solidly in the Band 6 range.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The student utilizes a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, incorporating subordinate clauses and participial phrases (e.g., 'Starting with 200,000 camera fines from first year...'). There are several grammatical and mechanical errors, such as missing articles ('from first year', 'reach the speed camera fines', 'main reason'), incorrect prepositions ('up between 400,000 to 600,000' instead of 'between 400,000 and 600,000'), and subject-verb agreement slips ('road accident fatalities has'). Despite these persistent errors, the sentence structures remain comprehensible and do not impede the reader's overall understanding, aligning well with the Band 6 descriptors.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
